I'd be very happy with thatDyche to scrape us to safety (with a few changes in Jan), see out his contract and be replaced by Tuchel in the early Summer (and then there will be big changes).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd be very happy with thatDyche to scrape us to safety (with a few changes in Jan), see out his contract and be replaced by Tuchel in the early Summer (and then there will be big changes).
I doubt Thelwell had much say in appointing Dyche.I note a lot of support for Thelwell to stay in place.
Well, the question we should be asking is: if the DoF job was advertised tomorrow by the Friedkins, would Kevin Thelwell be the outstanding candidate?
Just as Sean Dyche will, inevitably, leave the club at some point over the next nine months, I'd expect a similar timeline for Thelwell's continued employment.
Even if one credits Thelwell for doing a respectable job in the current circumstances, the reality is those circumstances will soon change. Just as Dyche is not being considered for a contract extension despite keeping our heads above water in extenuating circumstances, I don't see why Thelwell should be. Because they have been a team, a pair in this. And thank God they were. They deserve credit. But if we think Dyche should be replaced, I think similar must apply to Thelwell - or else a lot of this is mere PR and personal prejudice.
I hope we have a new manager and new DoF - if that is the model the Friedkins follow - by next June.
The club needs a complete reboot.
Yeah, I differ from you on Thelwell.I doubt Thelwell had much say in appointing Dyche.
As far as I can see, Dyche and thelwell have different football philosophies
No, I dont think the Friedkins would appoint Thelwell but I do think they might keep him in place during a lot of change.
Both thelwell and Dyche have done everything asked of them.
In Dyches case, I cant stand the football (or the guy anymore)
In Thelwells case, I'd be ok with him being kept in place during a lot of change.
I note a lot of support for Thelwell to stay in place.
Well, the question we should be asking is: if the DoF job was advertised tomorrow by the Friedkins, would Kevin Thelwell be the outstanding candidate?
Just as Sean Dyche will, inevitably, leave the club at some point over the next nine months, I'd expect a similar timeline for Thelwell's continued employment.
Even if one credits Thelwell for doing a respectable job in the current circumstances, the reality is those circumstances will soon change. Just as Dyche is not being considered for a contract extension despite keeping our heads above water in extenuating circumstances, I don't see why Thelwell should be. Because they have been a team, a pair in this. And thank God they were. They deserve credit. But if we think Dyche should be replaced, I think similar must apply to Thelwell - or else a lot of this is mere PR and personal prejudice.
I hope we have a new manager and new DoF - if that is the model the Friedkins follow - by next June.
The club needs a complete reboot.
He was answering two different questions.
December worst case (for the takeover to be completed)
January best case (for Friedkin to start spending)
You want the money for the January transfer window.Why would January be better than December?
This is exactly how I feel about it. I'd be delighted if Dyche was sacked, for example, but if Thelwell was sacked I'd just shrug my shoulders.I think Thelwell has done a fine job (not great, fine), but wouldn't be bothered if he was moved on.
What changes ? In janDyche to scrape us to safety (with a few changes in Jan), see out his contract and be replaced by Tuchel in the early Summer (and then there will be big changes).
Thelwell wanted coreberan apparentlyI doubt Thelwell had much say in appointing Dyche.
As far as I can see, Dyche and thelwell have different football philosophies
No, I dont think the Friedkins would appoint Thelwell but I do think they might keep him in place during a lot of change.
Both thelwell and Dyche have done everything asked of them.
In Dyches case, I cant stand the football (or the guy anymore)
In Thelwells case, I'd be ok with him being kept in place during a lot of change.
Should be changed even if we go on a winning streak, he’s not up to the job long term, nir is Thelwell, you also need to thinkI'd honestly like nothing more than both Dyche and Thelwell to be retained.
That will mean they are getting success and that's all I care about for Everton.
They're linked with appointing the head of Coca-Cola Italy as Roma's new CEO.
I think we can be reasonably confident that we'll have a decent board with no jobs for mates.
It's interesting that they are going to be scouting for a CEO for both Roma and Everton pretty simultaneously you'd think. Assuming they are not going to retain Colin Chong in the role, that is.
They're linked with appointing the head of Coca-Cola Italy as Roma's new CEO.
I think we can be reasonably confident that we'll have a decent board with no jobs for mates.
It's interesting that they are going to be scouting for a CEO for both Roma and Everton pretty simultaneously you'd think. Assuming they are not going to retain Colin Chong in the role, that is.