hktoffee
Birds of a feather flock together
Push Digne forward.Problem with that is we are then very lacking in attacking options. Digne has to play at least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Push Digne forward.Problem with that is we are then very lacking in attacking options. Digne has to play at least.
Without Allen who can get turned and beat a press our midfield is nonexistent and they all hide from the ball. Swear Mina and Keane play more forward passes between the lines than our midfielders do.
as for iceberg, for someone that’s supposed to be able to pass he really can’t pass for [Poor language removed] unless it’s a slow 5 yard sideways or backwards pass, coward
I just don't think he knows how to play the left sided/wing position personally but it may be a short term solution. I would also try Godfrey in midfield lad is lightningPush Digne forward.
Then that was not the 4 cb defence. Holgate, Mina, Keane, Godfrey - we get wins and draws.
Were playing with 2 attacking fullbacks yesterday we scored zero goal so it won’t matter if we play a flat 4. It’s only about the right balance.
352 won’t work. Newcastle away Leeds at home we don’t have players to play that formation.
Like the Wolves game away.I just don't think he knows how to play the left sided/wing position personally but it may be a short term solution. I would also try Godfrey in midfield lad is lightning
You need counter attacking pace to break the press. Our attacks are soooooo slow.I've noticed a trend, teams that press us high up at home have had success. It dates back to the Southampton game last season who pressed us relentlessly. Since then Leeds, West Ham, Leicester and Newcastle have all pressed us and had success. There seems to be an issue we have breaking the press. We need more players who can play in tight spaces and can beat players. We also need more pace across the team. Sig in central midfield does not help he is a void who can't get around the pitch.
It never works. In fact, I can’t recall we have ever been a success by playing 3 at the back never ever.We didn't play 352 against either of those sides btw - it was 343 against Leeds and we actually had 2 goals chalked off on the night the issue there was team selection we had Iwobi at LWB where he has never played and kin Davies as RWB.
Again the problem with a flat back 4 is it works against teams that we'll have 20% possession against but in games like Newcastle who wont dominate the ball we have to offer something to break them down.
Problem is we never ever look comfortable or know what we are doing in a 352We didn't play 352 against either of those sides btw - it was 343 against Leeds and we actually had 2 goals chalked off on the night the issue there was team selection we had Iwobi at LWB where he has never played and kin Davies as RWB.
Again the problem with a flat back 4 is it works against teams that we'll have 20% possession against but in games like Newcastle who wont dominate the ball we have to offer something to break them down.
You need counter attacking pace to break the press. Our attacks are soooooo slow.
It never works. In fact, I can’t recall we have ever been a success by playing 3 at the back never ever.
We used a flat back 4 in 6 games we won 5 and get 1 draw. We scored 9 and conceded 3 goals in 6 games. The stat speak for itself.
Chelsea, Leicester x 2, Arsenal, Sheff Utd, Wolves. We get 16 points out of that.And who did we play the flat back 4 against?
You can throw stats up to make any argument look right - I could say I scored 8 goals in 10 games means nothing if those 10 games where against Blue square 5th divisons under 12's.
Chelsea, Leicester x 2, Arsenal, Sheff Utd, Wolves. We get 16 points out of that.
You can throw stats up to prove 3-5-2 works for our team under Carlo, though.
We did not play a flat back 4 vs West Ham at home because Coleman came in.
We never know because we didn’t play the flat 4 yesterday when we should be. Also Olsen should be taken Pickford’s place. Past records proved that four cb defence works. When we move one of them away and put Coleman in we lost. This’s how the team react after we go for this flat 4 thing. We just getting wins and draws these are facts.And Sheff Utd aside (which we were poor against the worst side in the division) we largely have succeeded in games where we could defend in a low block and have 10 behind the ball for 90 minutes.
Newcastle done to us yesterday what we did to those teams - done us on set pieces & counter attacks.
We can play that way against better sides who come to have a go and leave themselves open we cant play that way against teams like Newcastle, Palace, Alladyce's WBA, WHU etc who are more than happy to rock up for a point and let us defend as much as we want whilst they keep 10 behind the ball themselves.
Those teams are beaten by having pace in your attack, creativity etc which we just lack all over the place. That's why we have decent results against the better sides but have stunk the gaff out against teams like Newcastle, Leeds, Southampton as when asked to actually do somethimg players like Siggurdsson, Davies, Gomes have nothing to offer.
We never know because we didn’t play the flat 4 yesterday when we should be. Also Olsen should be taken Pickford’s place. Past records proved that four cb defence works. When we move one of them away and put Coleman in we lost. This’s how the team react after we go for this flat 4 thing. We just getting wins and draws these are facts.