bobafro
Player Valuation: £8m
I have been thinking about something for a while now and I was wondering what others opinions were on this.
Ever since we bought Tim Cahill we've always attempted to play that support stiker role, with others like Ossie and now Fella playing that role. We've always tended to get lots of goals from midfield in this time and prolific strikers we've had tended to peter our after an inital glut of goals (i am not by any stetch of the imagination suggesting this is happening to Jela)
I always felt when watching Cahill and Saha play together that they seemed to get in each others way. They contantly wanted to take up the same positions. As the midfield had advanced so far the stikers tendency is to advance further which he can't and you see them pushed out wide. Saha use to be in wide positions with frustrating regularity and I've notice Jelavic taking up these positions now also since Fella has been supporting him. As a result our advanced midfield players seem to get into more goalscoring positions than our strikers which I think is counter-productive.
I am very interested to see how we set up tomorrow and how Jelavic performs without Fella in that role behind him. I guess what I'd like to see is more of a gap between our striker and 'support-striker'. Purpose of these comments was to start a discussion, anyone else following what I'm trying to say? agree/disagree etc...
Ever since we bought Tim Cahill we've always attempted to play that support stiker role, with others like Ossie and now Fella playing that role. We've always tended to get lots of goals from midfield in this time and prolific strikers we've had tended to peter our after an inital glut of goals (i am not by any stetch of the imagination suggesting this is happening to Jela)
I always felt when watching Cahill and Saha play together that they seemed to get in each others way. They contantly wanted to take up the same positions. As the midfield had advanced so far the stikers tendency is to advance further which he can't and you see them pushed out wide. Saha use to be in wide positions with frustrating regularity and I've notice Jelavic taking up these positions now also since Fella has been supporting him. As a result our advanced midfield players seem to get into more goalscoring positions than our strikers which I think is counter-productive.
I am very interested to see how we set up tomorrow and how Jelavic performs without Fella in that role behind him. I guess what I'd like to see is more of a gap between our striker and 'support-striker'. Purpose of these comments was to start a discussion, anyone else following what I'm trying to say? agree/disagree etc...