@WestStandLower
Great stuff.
I am a retired Management Accountant and I concur your POV as well. I suspect Everton were able to demonstrate a number of things to the Auditors - who would be asking probing, awkward questions to validate the accounts. I also suspect they wouldn't be hugely worried about Everton's version of events regarding foregone transfers and additional costs associated with retaining players. The wages are fact, the amortisation is fact. The theoretical Opportunity Costs another matter.
But Everton can certainly argue that discussions may have taken place to:
Sell Richarlison for £70M (instead of his current NBV of £10M)
Sell DCL for £60M (instead of his current NBV of £NIL)
Sell Kean for £25M or so (this hasn't materialised to date)
And so on.. and any other player you can think of. They might also seek to argue they would (partially) replace these players so would be some immediate commitment and wages for replacement "staff".
And they would be making these arguments on the basis that they were fully aware of the financial difficulties of recent Trading Losses and Extraordinary Losses associated with Covid.
So one presumes Leeds/Burnley haven't thought this through - not even called their Auditors for a chin wag.