DanEFC92
Player Valuation: £90m
Properly pants-on-head stupid. What did he think was gonna happen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Today’s Football 2019/20 Season
- Thread starter mmmmsnouts
- Start date
- Status
Properly pants-on-head stupid. What did he think was gonna happen
H.H.
Player Valuation: £10m
Kane hasn't fallen off, he just isn't getting any chances made for him for and there 3 reasons.
1) He is playing in front of a very average midfield,
2) Our manager is obviously playing him further back so that he can hopefully supply our two wide players.
3) Our past it dinosaur managers negative tactics does not make for many chances created and IMO, if Kane were to join City, because of the attacking football and the many more chances he would have, I think he would break goal scoring records.
TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
You can place the blame wherever you feel like but Kane used to be basically the best player non-Messi/Ronaldo division at getting shots away and not having all of them be from distance and he isn't doing that anymore. That's a fall off even if you want to put it all down to the stuff beyond his control. And personally I wouldn't do that because it started last year.
Also no duh on the City thing. Victor Anichebe might hit 20 of you just dropped him into that team for 30 games or so.
H.H.
Player Valuation: £10m
Ok, we all have different opinions and I think Kane is still a very good player and will set the world alight at City.
Your last paragraph, I have no idea what you've wriiten so I have no idea what you're on about?
TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
The last paragraph is basically saying drop any decent striker into the City team and they'll score a truck load. Iheanacho scored a league goal every 135 minutes for them.
H.H.
Player Valuation: £10m
My reply about Kane started when sone said that City need a Dzecho type striker and I think Kane could be that type of player for City.
Opinions are like balls, all us blokes have them and if people think Kane wouldn't score more goals for City than Iheanacho, then that's their opinion. It's not an opinion that I agree with though.
TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
That's not what I'm saying. All I mean is saying "Kane could score for City" means very little in the context of "is Kane as good as he was in 2017/18?"
H.H.
Player Valuation: £10m
OK. If you can't see the difference between playing for a very attacking team (which Spurs were under Poch a few years ago) and not scoring as many goals in a non attacking side (which Spurs have evolved into) then that's ok.
IMO, Kane would still score more goals for city than any other player in the P/L, including Aquaro, (who would have scored less goals if he was not playing for City.)
P.S. I'm not saying that Aquaro isn't a very good player, I just think Kane would score more.
Unfortunately, we will probably be finding it within 12 months.
EDIT; I'm busy so I can't reply any more.
TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
My take is part of the reason Spurs weren't an "attacking team" in Poch's last 12 months is Harry Kane wasn't as good. The Eriksen thing is the other big reason.
Ring master
Player Valuation: £90m
A watford win home to Norwich Live on Pick in a few mins,and maybe a man utd win at villa Thursday along with bournemouth drawing/losing to spurs if that happens, maybe go along way to who goes down
Palace v chelsea in few mins as well
Palace v chelsea in few mins as well
Alan Whittle
Player Valuation: £60m
C’mon Palace.
Ring master
Player Valuation: £90m
Your player should have done what that saints player did v City there lol,bit of a chance
Ring master
Player Valuation: £90m
cracking goal Norwich,close a minute ago as well
Alan Whittle
Player Valuation: £60m
5 mins. Cahill does his hamstring and one down.
Ring master
Player Valuation: £90m
1-1 now,easy header back post from free kick
- Status