Its the offside rule its absolute tosh.
If they amend that rule then it becomes much more enjoyable. You shouldn't be penalised for any part of the body you can not legally score a goal with.
Agreed. The biggest issue with VAR is that it's highlighted that football is based on an often vague set of laws which are open to a wide range of variations. For many years English sides had to adapt their game in European competition as it was commonly accepted that refs from other countries would see the game differently - not incorrectly - just different footballing cultures.
The homogenisation of football and every aspect of every match being scrupulously examined seems to have led to a narrative that VAR in and of itself is at fault or that refs are worse than ever. I'm not sure that's the case - it's a natural result of trying to force binary rights and wrongs on what has always previously been vague interpretation and not subjected to the same degree of examination and coverage.
Mix it in with bias from fans - RS fans will be suddenly aware of the exact rule, Chelsea fans will suddenly be bemoaning the nitpicking technicalities of it all, and a media desperate for relentless content and it blows up into something much bigger.
A minor point I'd disagree on though @ForeverBlue92 is that I think you can now score with the very upper part of the arm/shoulder where the line was drawn. I think handball is classed as lower down the arm, something to do with the (short) sleeve, it's a weird one - largely due to the need to nitpick because of the need for a black and white law after previous furore over whether the ball has legally come off a shoulder or arm.
TL/DR - The biggest issue with football is that people can't accept win some/ lose some when decisions don't go the way they want.