Today’s Football 2022/23 Season

[glory_daze]

Late, studs, shin.

Red card every time*

*Unless it's one of their players.

Didn't even analyse our ruled out goal but waxing lyrical about West Ham and Newcastle,s ones.

 

[toffee82]

Was that enough of a shove by the Palace player for a pen? Not for me. Therefore, the goal was rightly disallowed as the Newcastle player completely took out the keeper.

 

[toffee82]

Didn't even analyse our ruled out goal but waxing lyrical about West Ham and Newcastle,s ones.

And by all accounts, the deflection off their defender means it should have stood.

 

[Rita_Poon]

I can't think which two muppets from the show they most resemble but Shearer and murphy both suggested Howe up the ante with the var ref criticism. a la Moyes.
Todays point was a good one.

 

[Alanbileysfeathercut]

Shearer doesn't know the basics of offside, the ball played forward one,and then thinks vvd is a just a yellow.
And he says refs are clueless.
Oh and the other slaphead forgot about his beloveds losing to manure.

 

[Nymzee]

Was that enough of a shove by the Palace player for a pen? Not for me. Therefore, the goal was rightly disallowed as the Newcastle player completely took out the keeper.

Was enough of a shove to negate any foul called against Willock.

 

[toffee82]

Was enough of a shove to negate any foul called against Willock.

Thought Willock milked it looking for a pen (not anticipating they would score).

Suppose it should have stood as ref allowed it and it wasn't a clear and obvious error.

VAR is just so inconsistent it's pointless.

 

[McCall2Radzinski]

Disappointed in City today. Should've belted Villa and tightened the screws on Gerrard.

 

[PhilM]

I've just seen the goal disallowed for West Ham - scandalous.

 

[fabricsince1985]

Was that enough of a shove by the Palace player for a pen? Not for me. Therefore, the goal was rightly disallowed as the Newcastle player completely took out the keeper.

Not all shoves have to be with great force. He puts him off the flight off the ball and makes the collision with the keeper look worse, because he's not headed the ball before probably colliding with him anyway. It's either a penalty or a goal.

 

[Alan Whittle]

Not all shoves have to be with great force.

....then it wouldn’t be a shove?

 

[fabricsince1985]

....then it wouldn’t be a shove

I see that he pushes him, with the intention of making the player miss the ball or connect with the ball different to what he otherwise would have done. He then collides with the keeper as he would have most likely done anyway.

I don't see how out of everything that happens in that incident, Willock should be the one penalised. Which is what's being discussed, over and above my English language ability ha

 

[Alan Whittle]

I see that he pushes him, with the intention of making the player miss the ball or connect with the ball different to what he otherwise would have done. He then collides with the keeper as he would have most likely done anyway.

I don't see how out of everything that happens in that incident, Willock should be the one penalised. Which is what's being discussed, over and above my English language ability ha

So he collides with the keeper anyway irrespective of any contact. Probably why it was given. Normally I would agree with you but;
a) It’s Palace, so obviously it’s the correct decision and;
b) It’s Newcastle, so it’s very funny.

 

[fabricsince1985]

So he collides with the keeper anyway irrespective of any contact. Probably why it was given. Normally I would agree with you but;
a) It’s Palace, so obviously it’s the correct decision and;
b) It’s Newcastle, so it’s very funny.

See now we have common ground

 

[Ring master]

lol