So a foul can only be a foul if somebody breaks a leg?If that's a foul then the game is far too soft.
So a foul can only be a foul if somebody breaks a leg?If that's a foul then the game is far too soft.
Apart from the bit where he got none of the ball but caught Erickson …
So a foul can only be a foul if somebody breaks a leg?
So a foul can only be a foul if somebody breaks a leg?
So a foul can only be a foul if somebody breaks a leg?
I can’t believe I have to agree with the rarebit chomper, but he’s correctomundo my dear @ToffeeTim
Because one was a goal and the other was a challenge which was deemed a yellow card which occasionally might have been a red, but not enough for VAR to intervene imho.How are they reviewing that but not Van Dijks challenge yesterday?
Has the game gone at last then, lads?
I think the VAR try and scrutinise any goal these days regardless, which is half the problem like.What also makes me genuinely wonder.... if no United players had complained to the ref after the goal was scored would it have even been reviewed??