Think the number of games stat can be misleading as he was bound to get more games for us than equivalent players at bigger clubs due to it being harder to break into one of the top teams. Better players in front of you means restricted playing time. I am still not sure of his best position.
Thats a very fair point, and games at Liverpool are worth a greater weight than games for Everton as an indicator. That being said, Lampard was at West Ham who were similar, if not worse than where we are currently.
The key thing that Lampard, Gerrard and Scholes did, (and why the comparison is problematic) is that all 3 continued to improve year on year for the following 6 or 7 years, some dramatically so. With Lampard the move prompted it, for Gerrard its was Houllier giving him a run. Scholes it was when he was physically able to match the needs of the league.
Lots of players will get to 20 with a similar record, but few will continue to kick on (Rodwell for example has 71 games at the same stage)
I don't put those stats to say Davies will be as good as any of those 3. He should still get better as footballers generally do, but whether he improves as much as those 3 and year on year is obviously up for debate. I put it up as a counter weight to those who assume at 20 players should be putting in consistent performances every week or you'll never amount to anything. That is simply untrue, most young players are inconsistent at that age. It seems logical that the nightmare season we endured, and Davies endured would have undermined the performance of most young players.
Those excuses will have gone now though. It has been a relative stable pre-season, without incomings and with a manager who will do a lot of work on shape (which Davies needs). There will not be lots of new players who's styles we have to get used to, or embed in, This is a great opportunity for Davies to kick on. He needs to do so, and be significantly better than last season to have a long term future here, but I do have confidence he can do that.