Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

TOP 10 Films

Status
Not open for further replies.
images
That’s the view you used to get if you ever looked in the top of the bargain bin in blockbuster video.
 

Get yourself all aboard the Stanley Kubrick or Akira Kurosawa trains for such a monumental number!
Aye, only Lolita & Paths of Glory left on the Kubrick unseen. From Kurosawa only watched Rashomon so far which underwhelmed me a bit (was good, but not great), but willing to give him another bash.


Lawrence of Arabia is overrated by so many people, it’s nothing special I actually found it extremely dull.
Interesting view. I enjoy the old 50's/60's historical epics (John Huston's The Bible probably my fave, strong 9/10). Lawrence seems almost like a guaranteed good time but never know until finally watching.

Watch films on a big 3x2m projector screen, always enhances any flick! Even low-resolution DVDs look great.


Dario Argento‘s deep red would be my pick over Suspiria but again they’re not special.
Aye, saw a Bava & Fulci recently and wasn't that taken, so dialling down the Suspiria expectations.

Chinatown is a great film but Roman Polanski…
He's got a trio of 8/10's in Ninth Gate, Rosemary's Baby & Ghostwriter. Haven't seen Tenant or Repulsion yet.

Agree with his personal life leaving a somewhat sour taste (if that's what you meant)...but in most cases I try to separate art from the artist. With films it's easier as those projects involve hundreds of personnel to make it ultimately happen.

In my humble opinion of course, you cannot go wrong with the genre defining and much copied Seven Samurai which would be my pick for you, just pipping the Kirk Douglas inspired Paths of Glory.
Noted.

I would also like to state for the record that all Star Wars films are a disgrace 😀
All subsequent ones are largely a waste of time, tho' Solo was actually fun. And the original trilogy currently available is genuinely a disgrace, as there's all these horrible edits and extra CGI: that incredible scene at the end of Return of the Jedi with Vader silently looking between The Emperor and his son while Luke's getting zapped has been replaced by that terrible "NOOOOOO!" audio from the end of Return of the Sith.

A true disgrace to the art of film.

I have the only official DVD releases which have - as a bonus disc - the original theatrical cuts. Even Empire with the original Emperor (not Ian McDiarmid).

They're not remastered, but honestly all three are still fantastic movies. Well worth watching in place of any of the ones with tinkering. These DVDs are fairly common and can be had for about a fiver each on ye used markets.


The first Star Trek is a weird one, when II and IV exist.
Wrath of Khan is severely overrated: it's clumsy, low-stakes and even a little boring. Khan the villain makes no sense.

Space Seed (the original episode with a younger Khan) is superior: a more believable setup and a beguiling Khan (played by the same actor) with understandable motives.


IV is great, granted. As is VI. The 1979 Epic however is close to 2001 levels of proper science-fiction with weighty meaningful timeless philosophical ideas. Spectacular stuff, amazing twist.


Good list otherwise. Cannot get certain scenes from 2001 out of my head.
Aye...it shares Number One Greatest with Excalibur in my book. When Ligeti music combines with Monolith sightings I get existentialist chills! Even just thinking about those scenes sets them off. Mighty film-making.

Ligeti himself almost refused Kubrick permission but then he was shown a pre-release print and was sold, thank the gods.
 
I have both and there are quite a few parts of the film I like more in one than the other and vice versa, but if you asked me to pick it would be the David Fincher version as it has a better soundtrack and cinematography.
TBH, neither compare well to the book.

But I think the main characters, Roomi and Michaek Nyqvist, made the original film standout.
 
IV is great, granted. As is VI. The 1979 Epic however is close to 2001 levels of proper science-fiction with weighty meaningful timeless philosophical ideas. Spectacular stuff, amazing twist.
IV and VI are my picks. Agree re: Space Seed being better than the film-length version.

I get where you're coming from on I, but I do feel some authors did it better. Clarke (Rendezvous with Rama), in particular.
 
Oh aye, hard epic sci-fi in book form will always be a deeper experience than a 2-hour movie.



Top 10 book candidate! How on Earth hasn't this been made into a movie yet?
I'm watching. It's only his second-best book, because The City and the Stars exists. That one is my numero uno.
 

I'm watching. It's only his second-best book, because The City and the Stars exists. That one is my numero uno.
Haven't read that....might have to check it out!

Stephen Baxter's Space for the overall number 1 spot in the sci-fi section (if we're not counting Orwell's 1984 as sci-fi).

I've got a few notables still to read, tho': Three-Body Problem and Consider Phlebas on the shortlist.
 
Haven't read that....might have to check it out!

Stephen Baxter's Space for the overall number 1 spot in the sci-fi section (if we're not counting Orwell's 1984 as sci-fi).

I've got a few notables still to read, tho': Three-Body Problem and Consider Phlebas on the shortlist.
Baxter? Need to read that one, then.

The Dark Forest is way better than The Three-Body Problem, which is good.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top