Stoke fans are absolute muppets. Can't wait for the mutants pipe down once Yarmolenko scores against them december 28th and Shaqiri (the hobbit) has a dispute with the manager for attitude problems.
![]()
Stoke fans seem to think we can't afford him without selling Stones. Which is absolute nonsense.
I hope.
Net spend so far this window
1. Newcastle: £32.9m
2. Liverpool: £23.5m
3. West Brom: £22.5m
4. Watford: £20.7m
5. Man City: £20.3m
6. Crystal Palace: £20.2m
7. Bournemouth: £18m
8. West Ham: £17.8m
9. Leicester: £17.2m
10. Sunderland: £16.8m
11. Man United: £13.8m
12. Swansea: £8.5m
13. Norwich: £8.1m
14. Arsenal: £8m
15. Everton: £5.4m
16. Stoke: £4.5m
17. Aston Villa: £0.1m
18. Southampton: -£12m
19. Chelsea: -£15m
20. Spurs: -£16m
As in being at the bottom of the spending table this summer, not the board criticism if that's what you meant?Its not just about this window though, so i don't think it would.
Net spend so far this window
1. Newcastle: £32.9m
2. Liverpool: £23.5m
3. West Brom: £22.5m
4. Watford: £20.7m
5. Man City: £20.3m
6. Crystal Palace: £20.2m
7. Bournemouth: £18m
8. West Ham: £17.8m
9. Leicester: £17.2m
10. Sunderland: £16.8m
11. Man United: £13.8m
12. Swansea: £8.5m
13. Norwich: £8.1m
14. Arsenal: £8m
15. Everton: £5.4m
16. Stoke: £4.5m
17. Aston Villa: £0.1m
18. Southampton: -£12m
19. Chelsea: -£15m
20. Spurs: -£16m
Is that accurate? Who have Man City sold for 50 million?
Afraid they do, £11.2m for Alderweireld and £3.4m for Trippier. It's done using the best estimates all round. Spurs have just sold a tonne of players in the £5-£12m rangeThat's an interesting way of viewing it, but I don't think those figures include 'undisclosed' fees e.g. Alderweireld and Trippier for Spurs.
Surely that's not right?
Utd have spent about £100m haven't they without selling anyone of note.
Negredo and Nastasic come out at £26mIs that accurate? Who have Man City sold for 50 million?
he's a combination of Sheedy and Bale