I’d much rather a guy worth 18bilion putting his mates, relatives in the board. Than a guy who was potless
Precisely. People also need to realise that if Usmanov owns the club - and everything points to this reality - then it is, effectively, a "family business". Of course he will put people he trusts into positions of responsibility. If that is his nephew, then so be it. His accountant, sorry, "business partner" is already there. His nephew makes complete sense - especially as he doesn't see advantages in being personally present. His placemen are, well, in place.
I wouldn't be remotely concerned about family members taking the reins. I'd be more concerned about the type of individual who now owns the club. But then, why even bother with that given the way the game has now evolved? The club game is a billionaire's plaything. Very few of those gentlemen are "fit and proper" in the way Sir John Moores might have been. And even Sir John, for all his obvious commitment to Everton, was hardly a man of spotless credentials.
When the Qataris and Emirati are sportswashing through football, it's even possible to sympathise with the likes of Newcastle United who wish to install a murderous regime at the head of their operation. As implacably opposed as all right-thinking people should be to this kind of thing, it's hard not to draw the conclusion that "where the line is drawn" is incredibly self-serving and dubious. As it is, we have our own oligarch. The choice modern football clubs of size now face is stark: allow yourself to be subsumed by odious, sometimes murderous, investors - or become utterly irrelevant. The governance of the game has ensured this - and the clubs themselves, or rather their odious owners, have facilitated this decadent and immoral state of affairs.