Usmanov

[Groucho]

It sort of is difficult since there's been no verifiable links between this guy and the club for at least a year. Every post in here now is, almost by definition, off topic. Much like the Reinier Jesus thread.

Then be disciplined enough to leave the thread alone until there’s a development.

 

[havrey0123]

It sort of is difficult since there's been no verifiable links between this guy and the club for at least a year. Every post in here now is, almost by definition, off topic. Much like the Reinier Jesus thread.

Usmanov is going to make his move anytime now

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Usmanov is going to make his move anytime now

He isnt - if he becomes official he/USM can not sponser FF or any other future sponsorship deal.

Which is why puppet Moshiri is the public "owner"

 

[Billysgingham.]

He isnt - if he becomes official he/USM can not sponser FF or any other future sponsorship deal.

Which is why puppet Moshiri is the public "owner"

Mate you need to stop replying to rs supporters.

 

[Westend Blue]

Barkley left to win trophies and play cl football, a tick on both.
Arsenal and United rejected Kean because they couldn't guarantee first team football.
Mina, how many minutes did he actually play for Barca, then was on the bench most of the time when he was here last season. 60m buyback clause haha, they probably said that while negotiating with brands trying not to laugh.
Delph is a good player but injury prone hence pep gave him the chop.

Kean chose us because he was guaranteed first team footy and there is no evidence to suggest arsenal or United pursued him.

Barkley wouldn’t sign a new contract hence he was sold there’s many a quote of Martínez and koeman trying to extend his contract he’s a rat.

Mina was at Barca for 6 months the only reason they sold was becuase they made a 400% profit in 6 months

And delph was approached by brands and only sold after it because he wanted game time.

You are literally a few cells short of been a bottom feeder bacteria try harder

 

[Deco]

Mr Usmanov.

 

[Pudsey]

He isnt - if he becomes official he/USM can not sponser FF or any other future sponsorship deal.

Which is why puppet Moshiri is the public "owner"

Can't imagine this is true as Mioshiri is the M in USM.

 

[ForeverBlue92]

Can't imagine this is true as Mioshiri is the M in USM.

Only owns a small stake - im assuming they are more lenient to that rather than the bloke who owns about 60% of it.

 

[blulouie]

He isnt - if he becomes official he/USM can not sponser FF or any other future sponsorship deal.

Which is why puppet Moshiri is the public "owner"

How come Abu Dhabi own Man City and The Etihad Stadium ?

 

[AndyC]

Then be disciplined enough to leave the thread alone until there’s a development.

As there is no evidence whatsoever of Usmanov being involved with Everton, this is an argument there for locking this thread ??

 

[ForeverBlue92]

How come Abu Dhabi own Man City and The Etihad Stadium ?

God knows - more than likely Sheikh Mansour who is Citys "official" owner likely isn't the owner of Eithad Airways (could be wrong) although his family state own it so in essence its one big con but they can skirt around it.

I've always thought Usmanov/USM owns us but Moshiri is the face of our ownership due to Usmanov still retaining a stake in Arsenal at the time.

I think with FFP it wouldnt benefit us with him coming on board officially not atleast until we are more attractive as a club to outside sponsorship.

Who knows could be wrong!

 

[GrandOldTeam]

As there is no evidence whatsoever of Usmanov being involved with Everton, this is an argument there for locking this thread ??

He is IMO, albeit indirectly.

So do Panorama and then there's his own comments;

"Everton is still far from where it should be," he is reported to have said on TV channel, Russia 1. "We will also help him. And how. This is my friend's club!

"In Britain, sports are too political a sphere, so to speak. There is a great deal of tension today in business. Therefore, it is not known [how easy it would be for me to get involved]."

Close this thread for 'no evidence' and we'd be closing most transfer threads.

 

[AndyC]

He is IMO, albeit indirectly.

So do Panorama and then there's his own comments;

"Everton is still far from where it should be," he is reported to have said on TV channel, Russia 1. "We will also help him. And how. This is my friend's club!

"In Britain, sports are too political a sphere, so to speak. There is a great deal of tension today in business. Therefore, it is not known [how easy it would be for me to get involved]."

Disagree guvnor.
On the grounds that if he were involved, we probably wouldn't be still looking for finance for BMD.

 

[DanB90]

Disagree guvnor.
On the grounds that if he were involved, we probably wouldn't be still looking for finance for BMD.

Billionaires don’t make their fortune by spending their own money.

 

[AndyC]

Billionaires don’t make their fortune by spending their own money.

That's true, but his pull in financial areas will be significantly stronger than Moshiri.
If Usmanov were knowingly involved with Everton, finance would be sorted.