Ha ha you asked the question,
Ive just shown you our balance sheet position are you not concerned.
In the last set of accounts we were holding the largest debt in the clubs history, 66 mill. Thats before this years accounts before we make the biggest loss in the clubs history. Amortisation is an accounting practice, but its there for a reason and has significant impact on real life events, not least due regulation.
For example and in in tangent with meeting our debt obligation and controlling the balance sheet we had to sell some players we didnt want to, basically player trading, for me significantly we lost Gueye and Lookman, two player s i think we would have prefered not to. Granted both wanted moves but our financial position in my opinion and the need to get revenue into business made us very willing sellers, amortization came into those deals as well. Thats has had real life impact on results and progress in my opinion.
So holding 66 mill, we are likely going to accrue more in the next set of accounts with our huge loss, we are likely to take on debt north of an additional 500 mill quite shortly to fund BMD, given our balance sheet i dont think there is question that as business in isolation, the club finances are an unsustainable mess in isolation.
Think we will agree to differ, in terms of our points of view.![]()
Erm.. no mate. All the specific items you mentioned were income and expenditure items, I.e go on the P&L.
You didn't mention assets and liabilities until there now when you mentioned debt.
As for selling Gueye for financial reasons only, well no that's just daft. The lad wanted to play for PSG. Pure and simple. And Lookman is rubbish. Sold for footballing reasons.
I think you have a preconceived view and its throwing your facts. You seem convinced we cant service our debts. That's fine and up to you. But you've not given one reason why you believe we cant.