If that was the case they’d protect Man City too for this super league.
I'm not so sure. City aren't a team with a huge global support and
genuine revenue stream, which the likes of that shower, Real, Barca and Bayern et al. have.
Don't get me wrong, they're grown significantly over the past decade or so, but they are nowhere near Man United or others in terms of global appeal or audience.
If you were to go around America and China or any other country, how many people would say they're a City? Compare that to other teams listed above.
How many would buy their merchandise? Watch games? They are not a global team in the sense of those elite, and as such they can't compete with their revenue.
City's owners, like ours would probably want to do, would like to compete and therefore needs to invest heavily. FFP puts a big block on this, and stunts growth.
Those clubs who have historically prospered, at lest in terms of global image and how this financially supports them, are now protected by FFP - a global elite.
Forest won the CL twice, which is great, but it would be crass to say they're or ever have been a real global club in the sense of the above, nor will they ever be.
How can we compete with the best clubs if they've got the revenue, from their prestige, to buy the best when we're not allowed to spend money to close the gap?
City have spent the money to close the gap, and have been given a ban. Yes they're been playing with the accounts, which is wrong, but why did they have to?
It's a de facto closed shop because of the advantageous foundations that FFP has cemented itself on.