Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably be so Everton that we give them 20 million and Simms then Ellis scores boat loads for them and this lad flops massive or gets a serious injury.I said to that Coventry lad on here we’d give them £30m.
I said to that Coventry lad on here we’d give them £30m.
Probably be so Everton that we give them 20 million and Simms then Ellis scores boat loads for them and this lad flops massive or gets a serious injury.
Probably be so Everton that we give them 20 million and Simms then Ellis scores boat loads for them and this lad flops massive or gets a serious injury.
100%Do you think he would suit Dyches system?
Correct because Frank decided to give him 10 mins in a couple of games.I don't think Simms can play for Coventry this season.
Pretty sure he can only play for Everton or us as a player can't play for 3 different clubs in one season.
Correct because Frank decided to give him 10 mins in a couple of games.
In this situation I'd be happy for us to pay what might be over the odds for someone who might help to keep us up, but when I look at how Brighton have spent it's no wonder we're peed off with our board.
They got Mitoma straight out of the Japanese league for 2.5 million and Caicedo from Ecuador for 4 million. What are they worth now?
And while I'm here, how are Chelsea, for one, allowed to spend as much as they are and Everton isn't? Is it about FFP and if it is
what's the difference?
The reason FIFA are looking at tweaking FFP rules because Chelsea are paying over the odds for young talent on long contracts but with low payments.Chelsea obviously earn far more than Everton, but without having the figures I find it hard to believe that we have spent as high a percentage of our earnings as them, and they're still looking to bring in very expensive players.
We've been selling, not buying lately, and what we have bought has been cheap, apart from Onana.
I wouldn't be surprised if Notts Forest have spent more than us, pro-rata.
The reason FIFA are looking at tweaking FFP rules because Chelsea are paying over the odds for young talent on long contracts but with low payments.
For instance they buy five players on average £50 mill each all on seven year contracts. They then pay-in instalments of seven mills year so have an outgoing of 50 mill a year to pay, gives them longer to look for improved sponsorships or cook books for FFP.