Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was historically European cup winner - plus you would not mind his pay off from MosheriBenitez is not big name.
He was a failed Chinese managerHe was historically European cup winner - plus you would not mind his pay off from Mosheri
Why would Kovac be awful but anyone else be good? They're all starting from 0, with the slight exception of Duncan who has a grand total of, what, 3 managerial matches in his life?Which is why somebody like Kovac would be awful
Because he'd come in and 'assess the squad' for 6 months just like every other bum we've hiredWhy would Kovac be awful but anyone else be good? They're all starting from 0, with the slight exception of Duncan who has a grand total of, what, 3 managerial matches in his life?
It's the team who wins the league- Leicester rocky without massive signings.....As stated earlier, we cannot continue to hold this as some sort of mantra, football has moved on, the premier league is an international league, the days when we were winning stuff with ex-players most clubs were still mostly British owned and staffed (four years after the prem started). Nothing says small time like a club that still looks inwards for progression.
Yes I agree but his CV had much more than that on it .....a disasterous appointment like all of them ....He was a failed Chinese manager
Probably notSame with Tuchel. Would you have taken him?
Don't be naïve enough to think that Lampard had any input on incoming transfers at Chelsea. He was given players.
He did Chelsea a favour by blooding Mount (and Tomori & Abraham to get them sold), but he didn't assemble a squad.
If anything he turned a collection of world class players into a mid-table outlet.