Nebbiolo
Valuation: £108 million
So your saying the first should get seven years and the second a non-custodial sentence?
Important to think what kind of message that would send to society.
"Don't worry kids, you can drive drunk, at twice the speed limit, kill someone, try and blame someone else and you'll be let off"...
Difficult to say because I've not sat through the cases. My initial instinct is that number 1 deserves a lengthy prison sentence. If I heard a convincing sob story, I might have gone in at two or 3 years. If she didn't convince me, I'd be looking at a bit longer, maybe the seven years I initially proposed.
The same would go for the second case. My instinct is a terrible accident, and an immature young woman that will learn a harsh lesson. If no evidence came to light to tell me differently, I'd be lenient.