….ffs, I feel sick to my stomach with all this.
gwladysnight
Player Valuation: £10m
It is a different PSR period.
It would be similar to saying you can't do me for speeding today because you caught me yesterday.
The idea of a rolling three-year period is that it gives a club some leeway if they have big losses in one year. If you have one year with big losses you have two years to put it right. Instead of doing that the board tried to blag it and got caught.
bluenorthwarrior
Player Valuation: £6m
We spend close to that every day if the 20m per month working capital needs is accurate.
We're talking 100s of millions if we get hammered for more points.
all of the fan base around the world mate!
ashwuk76
Player Valuation: £30m
There is a marked difference in us and Forest "admitting" guilt (which i know both dispute)
We had zero choice in the matter as we had to submit the SAME accounts we had already been found guilty of by a comission for breaching (yes we are appealing) To submit anything else would have baught about shouts of fraud. The fact the club have said acknowledge and not admit is telling. It will be intersting to see how much the alleged breach is for us this time. We knew we were going to be in breach because our hands were tied with what accounts we could submit.
Its different for Forest, they havent already been punished like we have. This is the first time for them and probably why they have said they hope for a swift conclusion (that wont happen) It will be interesting to see how much they have alledgegy breached by as well.
All in all a horror show from the PL here and convienient that they changed the rules to charge clubs "in-seaon" for breaches. They did that knowing full well it would catch us again, catching Forest was a bonues for them.
All in all, the PL have done little to persuede the Government not to introduce an independant regulator, in fact as I have previously posted, job adverts are out to start the commision process off. Shot themselves in the foot big tim here have the PL.
We had zero choice in the matter as we had to submit the SAME accounts we had already been found guilty of by a comission for breaching (yes we are appealing) To submit anything else would have baught about shouts of fraud. The fact the club have said acknowledge and not admit is telling. It will be intersting to see how much the alleged breach is for us this time. We knew we were going to be in breach because our hands were tied with what accounts we could submit.
Its different for Forest, they havent already been punished like we have. This is the first time for them and probably why they have said they hope for a swift conclusion (that wont happen) It will be interesting to see how much they have alledgegy breached by as well.
All in all a horror show from the PL here and convienient that they changed the rules to charge clubs "in-seaon" for breaches. They did that knowing full well it would catch us again, catching Forest was a bonues for them.
All in all, the PL have done little to persuede the Government not to introduce an independant regulator, in fact as I have previously posted, job adverts are out to start the commision process off. Shot themselves in the foot big tim here have the PL.
leg it you RS
but mate won’t they relegate us the change it?
@davek, we have a job for you, for the cause, stick your head in the junction box.
Spadge Vernacular
Player Valuation: £60m
It seems clear that pretty much all parties have highlighted the perceived severity of the previously imposed penalty in relation to the specific charge, suggesting that it establishes a new precedent. In comparison to sanctions imposed on other clubs for financial infractions, the repercussions for us, in true Everton style blatantly exceed previous penalties.
A notable example that I am sure our legal team will be questioning is the case of Portsmouth in 2010, when they entered administration due to serious mismanagement and received a 9-point penalty. In 2012, facing administration for the second time in three years, they incurred a 10-point deduction. To insinuate that Everton's actions are more flagrant than these instances is, frankly, absurd.
A notable example that I am sure our legal team will be questioning is the case of Portsmouth in 2010, when they entered administration due to serious mismanagement and received a 9-point penalty. In 2012, facing administration for the second time in three years, they incurred a 10-point deduction. To insinuate that Everton's actions are more flagrant than these instances is, frankly, absurd.
John from Bootle
Player Valuation: £8m
The mitigation thing is key here I reckon. I'm no legal expert, but hear me out...
They listened to our mitigation last time, took it all in to account, and decided on a punishment. If the same mitigation is in play, then they've already judged on it, have they not? Surely you can't just punish us again and not discount that part of any supposed breach?
spectateur
Player Valuation: £25m
At this stage they have knowledged the charges.
Not admitted to them.
SpiritOfTheBloos
Player Valuation: £50k
What is the charge, signing McNeil!!?? Tarkowski and McNeil!!!???
