ForeverEverton
Player Valuation: £40m
Starting to hear rumours of 6 points with 2 suspended...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And even if you allow wiggle room for unpredictable circumstances…. They sold Johnson two whole months later. 1/6th of the next financial year. If they’d sold him at the earliest possible opportunity then maybe but they sold him at the latest possible opportunity. It’s BS.There has to be a cutoff, arbitrary or not. PSR is a farce, but thems the rules.
For us?Starting to hear rumours of 6 points with 2 suspended...
No sign of that anywhere that I can see blud.Starting to hear rumours of 6 points with 2 suspended...
No doubt find a way to dock us a few more for this.
Yes, I don't see how the IC can accept that argument. It would throw the whole PSR into chaos as other clubs could try to claim that sales after the close of the PSR window but before the transfer window closes should be applied to the prior PSR accounting period. There is a cut off date for a reason. Plus, the argument did not work for us with Richarlison.Nottingham Forest expected to learn outcome of Profitability and Sustainability (PSR) early this week
Nottingham Forest are expecting to learn Profitability and Sustainability (PSR) fate early this week; Forest are the second club to be charged for breaches this season, alongside Everton, who were docked six points; Nuno Espirito Santos side three points above relegation zonewww.skysports.com
Compare the narrative here compared to the many pieces we had written about us around the time of our original deduction...
Is there a 'but' coming?
Yes. Two, in fact.
The first 'but' is that Forest believe they were only in breach for two months - between filing their accounts on June 30 last year and September 1 when they received the first instalment of their sale of Brennan Johnson to Tottenham.
The dates are significant because Forest - and at least one other Premier League club that we are aware of - believe that the dates for Premier League accounting should be aligned with the transfer window.
And the second 'but' is that Forest believe not only would they have been within FFP and the Premier League's sustainability rules had they sold Johnson in June, but selling Johnson in September was in the 'spirit' of those sustainability rules.
Those arguments seem extremely weak to me.
I agree.Surely not seeing as we've been given a 6 point penalty and the next breach already tasks a majority of the first breach into account - should be a quarter of the first amount / a third of it. Two points maximum. Obviously wouldn't put it past the Premier League to throw the book as us though.
If the accept the Brennan Johnson defence I see no reason we couldn’t use the sale of Iwobi on deadline day in a similar way. It would be ludicrous but it would be consistent.Yes, I don't see how the IC can accept that argument. It would throw the whole PSR into chaos as other clubs could try to claim that sales after the close of the PSR window but before the transfer window closes should be applied to the prior PSR accounting period. There is a cut off date for a reason. Plus, the argument did not work for us with Richarlison.
Starting to hear rumours of 6 points with 2 suspended...
Just rumour at this stage.... it could be well be wrongYessss
Just rumour at this stage.... it could be well be wrong