ForeverEverton
Player Valuation: £40m
Starting to hear rumours of 6 points with 2 suspended...
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
And even if you allow wiggle room for unpredictable circumstances…. They sold Johnson two whole months later. 1/6th of the next financial year. If they’d sold him at the earliest possible opportunity then maybe but they sold him at the latest possible opportunity. It’s BS.
For us?
GoldenToffee
Player Valuation: £50m
No sign of that anywhere that I can see blud.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
No doubt find a way to dock us a few more for this.
Frenk
Player Valuation: £30m
Well that’s Jarrad off the menu. Sorry Jarrad you’re staying lad.
Yes, I don't see how the IC can accept that argument. It would throw the whole PSR into chaos as other clubs could try to claim that sales after the close of the PSR window but before the transfer window closes should be applied to the prior PSR accounting period. There is a cut off date for a reason. Plus, the argument did not work for us with Richarlison.
Nottingham Forest expected to learn outcome of Profitability and Sustainability (PSR) early this week
Nottingham Forest are expecting to learn Profitability and Sustainability (PSR) fate early this week; Forest are the second club to be charged for breaches this season, alongside Everton, who were docked six points; Nuno Espirito Santos side three points above relegation zonewww.skysports.com
Compare the narrative here compared to the many pieces we had written about us around the time of our original deduction...
Is there a 'but' coming?
Yes. Two, in fact.
The first 'but' is that Forest believe they were only in breach for two months - between filing their accounts on June 30 last year and September 1 when they received the first instalment of their sale of Brennan Johnson to Tottenham.
The dates are significant because Forest - and at least one other Premier League club that we are aware of - believe that the dates for Premier League accounting should be aligned with the transfer window.
And the second 'but' is that Forest believe not only would they have been within FFP and the Premier League's sustainability rules had they sold Johnson in June, but selling Johnson in September was in the 'spirit' of those sustainability rules.
Those arguments seem extremely weak to me.
I agree.
All I care about is Everton not being relegated for a points deduction. Perhaps if Forest only being given 4 points (whilst annoying) meant there's a far lower chance of Everton being given any further point deductions then I would take it. Still be 3 points above Luton with a game in hand with them facing Tottenham and Arsenal away in their next two games.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
If the accept the Brennan Johnson defence I see no reason we couldn’t use the sale of Iwobi on deadline day in a similar way. It would be ludicrous but it would be consistent.
Haha alex crooks is a clown , saying nottingham forests deduction will likely be less because they were less confrontational than Everton, we completely complied and they went over by 60 million and actually gained a sporting advantage but nffc's penalty should be less because they're were more civil is absurd. The fact the Premier league is set to adopt new rules for next season just makes everything even more insane especially with other clubs being recently reported of breaking the rules
coollino
Player Valuation: £80m
Yessss
ForeverEverton
Player Valuation: £40m
Just rumour at this stage.... it could be well be wrong
coollino
Player Valuation: £80m
toffeeblue9
Player Valuation: £35m
FOUR POINTS WTF
www.theguardian.com
Nottingham Forest docked four points for Premier League financial rules breach
Nottingham Forest have received a four-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules
The Championship under the FA - do all these points deductions at the beginning of a season mainly .....
