Am gona absolutely batter someone.
Starting point of 5. But I thought the starting point was 3 as per Forests deduction?
so did my wifi mate
5 for us, 3 for everyone else lolStarting point of 5. But I thought the starting point was 3 as per Forests deduction?
I
it was £121.6m. The threshold is zero
They've already said they're appealing serious question what do people think they should do go on strike or what? They've been charged twice and appealed twice why do people keep saying they're just accepting it?Let’s see what this weak club do and say now
Yeah but the appeal won't in any way look at our first breach and use that in our mitigation. They'll look at it as a breach of 16m and a punishment of -2, which they'll deem more than fair compared to Forest.16.6m over this time.
So the TOTAL of our two breaches barely exceeds Forest’s one. 8-4 on points.
Think there is scope for the appeal.
Yeah but the appeal won't in any way look at our first breach and use that in our mitigation. They'll look at it as a breach of 16m and a punishment of -2, which they'll deem more than fair compared to Forest.
Hell, this might even lead to Forest being given 2 points back now they've 'only' docked us a further 2 ...
Surely the target is actually a profit rather than just breaking even?No, the target is 0. The threshold is £105 over 3 years. Have you read nothing?
Im just guessing here, but last time we didnt have any reduction of revenue due to the Ukraine war, this time we did.So the Ukraine mitigations were accepted in his time but not for the first breach? What?