No inconsistency. I said he played negative football and that others confused that with pragmatism. For example, if he played negative football against Arsenal at the Emirates but played a more attacking style against weaker teams at home, then that could be called pragmatism. However, if you play negative, safety first, don't concede, hope to sneak a goal on a set piece football against everyone, then that's not pragmatism that's just how you want to play football. Pragmatism implies some sort of compromise or at least an adjustment to deal with a varying challenge. There's none of that. We play the same formation, largely with the same players and with the same patterns of play against everyone. Once again, in my opinion, that is not pragmatism.
We'll find out soon enough whether I'm wide of the mark as Dyche always has periods where he wins no games. He's had them every season at every club he's ever been at, usually multiple spells a season. My bet is that you'll still be in here rationalising why it's not his fault/he's actually doing a good job/the risk of replacing him exceeds the risk of keeping him when that happens.