Search results for query: *

Something about that just doesn't add up...

Ozil wasn't bought as a goalscorer mate, and he's a brilliant player.

For it to be a simple cost benefit analysis there would have to be a clear return on the 54m, which I think is hard to argue - why would having lukaku next season bring us champs league when it didn't this season or the last 3. There's also a lot of risk, like if we have a terrible season next...

You're saying you'd pay £50m for a one year loan? Plus around £4m on his wages?

They recouped money on a lot of the signings that failed and also bought a couple of good players in lamela and, especially, Eriksen. Agree with the point in general though.

Rubbish today sadly

The Torres transfer from Liverpool to Chelsea is an interesting comparison. Similar record, proven goalscorer in the prem, and a couple of years older at the time than Rom is now. Went for £50m in 2011. Fees have increased significantly since then.

Hope he scores another ten before end of season and we get 100m for him

football is depressing sometimes eh

I still think he'll sign

Maybe you disagree but I find it hard to blame him for the isolation he had to endure against stoke. Very few strikers in the world are game winners every week.

Unbelievable player.

Not dissimilar to Costa's goal against West Brom recently. He's definitely up there with the best in the league, and all the more impressive because of the paucity of supply has had this season.

Boss finish. Everyone needs to calm down talking sh*te about his ability. Fair enough to question his attitude but he's a quality striker.

Interesting to see Henry's analysis of his movement at half time. Implied that Rom's biggest problem is his failure to make intelligent runs.

Best performance to date, although he got a bit tired in the second half. Deulofeu's early deliveries are great for him because he's so strong in the box.

was pretty bad today