Search results for query: *

He visited on Saturday morning.

Only a matter of time.

Crazy. Sigurdsson is 28 in september and Barkley has 1 year left. I do believe that Spurs want him and that he will end up there, unfortunately, but it'll be late, when Spurs like to act and we will realise we don't want an unhappy Barkley sitting around until Christmas and then maybe even go...

Neither will fetch £50m

Oh God I got lured into a net spend debate. What a tit I am.

Pipe down

Well then that article and many other that ran that story about Liverpool ending their transfer business last summer on profit are wrong then as they labled It as a positive net spend. I can't see how receiving more than you spend can be classed as negative.

How can spending more that you've received be classed as positive? The figures were based on that little bit that SKY did just prior to the Keane signing where they had us at £96m since Jan, so I added he Keane fee to that. In terms of received, we e got a guaranteed £75m from Lukaku £8m from...

Why?

Barkley is on the back of his best season IMHO. I want him to sign and Sigurdsson to join, we need options.

I reckon we have spent about £126m this year and recieved £93m so a negative net spend of £33m as is. Not that it matters.

£50m you say??

It should also be remembered how far away we were coming from, that often means paying over the odds.

That's like an eye test.

Cheers mate.

They did this with Williams, the Sunday people claimed he'd joined us about two weeks before he did.

The club should launch that £32m on at 4/1 and leave him there and sign Mbappe with the winnings.

No way our club finds out about this via the media. Swansea will act professionally, this'll be for their fans. They're fully entitled to do it. Just move to the next target.

We've spent over £125m since Jan and only received £95m so your maths is as bad as your impersonation of an Evertonian. Tedious.