£40m Bid Made For Sigurdsson

[billyblue80]

You ain't getting both of those for a combined 50 mate, no chance

I think those are the two we need personally or of that type. Gylfi is a good player I like him, but the price is absurd and we have players in that position.

 

[hetion]

The problem they'll have though is trying to replace Sigurdsson because he was probably the main reason they stayed up last season. So is spending £50m on 3/4 average players going to replace what he brings to the team for them.

When there's as many holes in the squad as Swansea has and the average level is so poor, yes. Relying on one player every season to plonk a certain amount of balls on the big man up front's head isn't a good longterm strategy

 

[d4kyxx]

I've heard 48 hours every day for the last two weeks

He will sign today/tomorrow.. etc etc

So many people who make things up on here hahaaaa

 

[ToffeeTim]

The lads just being top lads and getting obsessed over transfers despite being over 15 years old. The guys. The compadres.

Find some new material chico lad lol

 

[chicoazul]

Find some new material chico lad lol

The oldies are goodies Timothy you bible bashing Ulster cultist.

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

When there's as many holes in the squad as Swansea has and the average level is so poor, yes. Relying on one player every season to plonk a certain amount of balls on the big man up front's head isn't a good longterm strategy

We'll have to agree to disagree mate because replacing your best player with a few average players (£50m won't get them much) to fill gaps doesn't make sense to me.

 

[Michaelcoyb]

The lads just being top lads and getting obsessed over transfers despite being over 15 years old. The guys. The compadres.

Can we go back to the days when you actually contributed to threads? Thems were the days

 

[chicoazul]

Can we go back to the days when you actually contributed to threads? Thems were the days

I can't even remember back to those days mate.

 

[hetion]

We'll have to agree to disagree mate because replacing your best player with a few average players (£50m won't get them much) to fill gaps doesn't make sense to me.

Fair dos. I just reckon in the long term it makes more sense to me. To be fair for me it's a lot about their goal being to avoid relegation - ie, it's more important to try and not be really bad, than it is to try and be really good...if that makes any sense at all

 

[Timak]

We'll have to agree to disagree mate because replacing your best player with a few average players (£50m won't get them much) to fill gaps doesn't make sense to me.

Isn't that what we are doing but just on a bigger scale.

We are losing our two best attackers and replacing them with inferior players but with an idea that overall the team will be strengthened?

 

[ProZ]

This saga is that boring that even Sky Sports can't be arsed reporting it.

 

[harris78]

Every time I look in this thread...

 

[Deleted member 28206]

 

[eddy]

Bang average? You dont watch football do you?

Think he is top end age wise and been good in a poor side, sooner keep Barklay. I dont see the top 4 clubs chasing his signature either, could be wrong though United Spurs may come in and gazump us with a `55 million bid` ...... then again they may still be picking themselves up off the floor laughing saying `how much`........

 

[ijjysmith]

The lads just being top lads and getting obsessed over transfers despite being over 15 years old. The guys. The compadres.

The boys.