Never comes
I swear if this is anything this forum keeps me entertained lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never comes
Hearing this will be wrapped up within the next 48, more as and when I get it.
You sound like my wifeHideously narrow that.
Rather a player that produces from open play than one that relies on the lucky dip that is a set piece. Out the two I know which one of prefer and it ain't gylfiWho got more assists, ross or gylf? Couldn't care less who creates more chances, I want productivity.
It's not a choice we have though. Forget Ross, he doesn't want to play for Everton.Rather a player that produces from open play than one that relies on the lucky dip that is a set piece. Out the two I know which one of prefer and it ain't gylfi
It's not a choice we have though. Forget Ross, he doesn't want to play for Everton.
Your comparison needs to be between Gylfie and some other achievable target.
Any evidence for this? Could do with drawing a line under this one.
Like this always happy to learn something new How does Barkley stack up in expected assistsEFC Statto needs to read up on football analytics.
Long shots taken is a terrible stat. It indicates the player is producing high volumes of low chance shots.
Accurate crosses also. It doesn't tell us whether the cross was a high up and under that had no chance of being scored from or a ball whipped across the 6 yard box that was missed by a few inches but was "inaccurate" as no-one touched it.
The best stat for creative players is expected assists. This adds up the chances of a goal being scored from every chance created (and means you aren't punished for laying on chances for a terrible striker or rewarded for playing square passes on the halfway line to Messi). By that measure Sigurdsson was two players last year, a set piece master (top from free kicks) and a woeful outfield player (not even in the top 70 in xA).
EFC Statto needs to read up on football analytics.
Long shots taken is a terrible stat. It indicates the player is producing high volumes of low chance shots.
Accurate crosses also. It doesn't tell us whether the cross was a high up and under that had no chance of being scored from or a ball whipped across the 6 yard box that was missed by a few inches but was "inaccurate" as no-one touched it.
The best stat for creative players is expected assists. This adds up the chances of a goal being scored from every chance created (and means you aren't punished for laying on chances for a terrible striker or rewarded for playing square passes on the halfway line to Messi). By that measure Sigurdsson was two players last year, a set piece master (top from free kicks) and a woeful outfield player (not even in the top 70 in xA).
Like this always happy to learn something new How does Barkley stack up in expected assists
Thanks pretty worryingReally good article on it here:
https://differentgame.wordpress.com...out-gylfi-sigurdsson-v-ross-barkley-part-one/
Unless you understand the limitions of those stats and the difference between the two players.Thanks pretty worrying