Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Innocent until proven guilty. The FA cannot suspend a player and then accuse us of failing to sell him because he is suspended. This is a farce.The difference was that Siggurdson's alleged offence was against a child. That brings in safeguarding issues.
You have two outcomes. Either overspending helped us stay up or it didn't. The tribunal would have to decide which was the more likely outcome.Thats what I get for for watching murder documentaries in my free time. So how does balance of probability work?
You have two outcomes. Either overspending helped us stay up or it didn't. The tribunal would have to decide which was the more likely outcome.
What about the BBC football expert talking about our next league game at Old Trafford?We're also not bottom of the league. NY Times don't even spend 5 seconds checking.
It isn't though. The FA and Everton have a duty of care to young players.Innocent until proven guilty. The FA cannot suspend a player and then accuse us of failing to sell him because he is suspended. This is a farce.
Short tribunal then. Nothing we spent that season solely resulted in points.You have two outcomes. Either overspending helped us stay up or it didn't. The tribunal would have to decide which was the more likely outcome.
It was the lead story on BBC news at 6Luis Diaz's dad celebrating his son scoring twice? On primetime national news.
Our points deduction? Not an utterance.
We know where we stand, folks.
It was the lead story on BBC news at 6
That's fine - but the Premier League cannot then say to Everton that we are hitting you with a 10-point penalty because you have failed to sell a player who we suspended because we have a duty of care. Where is the mitigation? You can blame Everton for a lot of things, but you cannot use a case that effectively put them over the spending limit as the stick to beat them with when they carried out their duty of care.It isn't though. The FA and Everton have a duty of care to young players.
Would you be happy for your child to be taught by a teacher who had been arrested for child sex offences based on him being innocent until proven guilty?