6 + 2 Point Deductions

[allen]

I think it stated 3 points for going over, 3 ooints for going over by a lot but 2 points back for cooperation.
By that calculation im expecting 3 points

But then they need to consider that two thirds of the period covered was covered by the previous charge and as such punishment should be divided by three.

What they choose to consider, though, seems entirely up to the individual panel, because the rules aren’t anything like detailed enough to do the job they are intended to.

 

[MikeH72]

I think it stated 3 points for going over, 3 ooints for going over by a lot but 2 points back for cooperation.
By that calculation im expecting 3 points

If we’re nice though we can get 2 taken off can’t we?

 

[DualityNSNO]

If we’re nice though we can get 2 taken off can’t we?

No because we were already rude. Probably.

 

[NathDogg]

But then they need to consider that two thirds of the period covered was covered by the previous charge and as such punishment should be divided by three.

What they choose to consider, though, seems entirely up to the individual panel, because the rules aren’t anything like detailed enough to do the job they are intended to.

We’re all guessing, and that includes any independent panel and the premier league - it’s a total farce.

 

[HTCHERO]

It will be interesting when the city case is heard as they have 115 charges. Let's say the majority are dismissed and 15 stand. They won't have acted in good faith (They have lied and stalled) and this would still relegate them based on 15x6 for not acting in good faith.

This crap league gets worse by the day.

 

[luuk_deventer]

 

[CahillsCornerFlag]

I can only assume Matt Hughes’ ma got ran through by the entire Everton side when he was a kid, and that he had to listen to the headboard banging on the wall to the tune of Z cars. The fella absolutely hates us.

 

[riddick]

This club is such an embarrassment and pathetic. Has been ever since I started following. Clattenberg admits to denying. Penalty straight up and we just sit there happy to be along for the ride.

Everyone in the club should be ashamed of how we've been run for the last decade.

 

[Blue Smoke]

Yes we may be cooperating on this charge and theres the double jeopardy, but i think theyll use that to say why we've o ly got 3 points instead of 6

 

[Blue Smoke]

I think theyll (PL) hope if we get 3 points and forest have been given 4 points that they will avoid appeals from both clubs. They'll want to avoid appeals at all costs if possible.
I imagine behind closed doors theyve told forest that they should be grateful for just 4 points

 

[DuncanPatterson]

This "Forest cooperated fully" bollocks doing the rounds in the media as the justification for why we got 10 initially and they're getting four doesn't stand up at all

Agreed. We probably need exact details on how they've fully co-operated and how it differs significantly from how we've co-operated

The guy in that video mentioned a 50 page document or something so perhaps those specific details are in there

 

[ForeverEverton]

From the Gov website, notice the part about fining up to 10% fine for non compliance on financial sustainability...

Historic Football Governance Bill introduced in Parliament

Historic legislation to reform the governance of men's elite football in England and put fans back at the heart of the game has been introduced in Parliament today.

www.gov.uk

 

[sbbefc]

How many points deducted are we looking at? Just so I can brace myself, mentally.

We could get 6. We should get 0. We will probably get 4 and a good chance of an appeal looming over us into the summer.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

I think theyll (PL) hope if we get 3 points and forest have been given 4 points that they will avoid appeals from both clubs. They'll want to avoid appeals at all costs if possible.
I imagine behind closed doors theyve told forest that they should be grateful for just 4 points

No chance we would settle for a further three unless ours is on the same scale as Forests (and most reports suggest our 2nd is much less than both Forests and our own first). That's only one less than Forest got for an egregious 34m breach with all mitigations bar cooperation rejected.

We have mitigations of our own to argue, most notably double punishing years and possibly the scale, and I imagine we'll have cooperated ourselves more fully. Bearing that in mind only 1 less than Forest would be a poor result and an almost certain appeal.

 

[Moderatelywarmwater]

No chance. They've thrown the book at us at every point.

And the bookshelf last time