I don't get why the clubs unanimously agreed on spending being 85% of revenue.
Seems like more safety rails for the top 6.
Seems like more safety rails for the top 6.
There's still a worry that once we get to a third or fourth breach, this'll change to "repeat offender, worse punishment" territory...That's true and if (always a big IF) they are consistent and stick to the formula they used on double jeopardy then clubs getting their first punishment will get done for more points for a three year breach than us for an additional one year.
It's pretty ridiculous how commonplace this could become over the next couple of seasons though.
And, if we're already at 90+% on wages alone, how are we expecting to be able to sign anyone, ever?
By the time this new system comes in the stadium will be open and the increase in revenue will kick in and boost our ratio. Bearing in mind a move away from anything P&L based takes stuff like interest repayments out of the equation. If we can get through the next two seasons intact the change in system definitely benefits us.And, if we're already at 90+% on wages alone, how are we expecting to be able to sign anyone, ever?
True but in the short term, how do we even put out a squad that's remotely competitive next season? It'll need some miracles to be worked by whoever is manager for sureBy the time this new system comes in the stadium will be open and the increase in revenue will kick in and boost our ratio. Bearing in mind a move away from anything P&L based takes stuff like interest repayments out of the equation. If we can get through the next two seasons intact the change in system definitely benefits us.
Until we start giving Michael Keane a new contract at 200K a week.By the time this new system comes in the stadium will be open and the increase in revenue will kick in and boost our ratio. Bearing in mind a move away from anything P&L based takes stuff like interest repayments out of the equation. If we can get through the next two seasons intact the change in system definitely benefits us.
You'd hope that this should lower what players earn, no more bang average players pocketing 100k a week. This is a better way of doing things it's easier for clubs to self regulate. It still benefits the rich clubs but any financial rules will short of a hard cap on spending. There should be allowance for a new owner to come in and spend his own money for a few years in an attempt to make their club successful.And, if we're already at 90+% on wages alone, how are we expecting to be able to sign anyone, ever?
It's going to be tough, there's no denying that.True but in the short term, how do we even put out a squad that's remotely competitive next season? It'll need some miracles to be worked by whoever is manager for sure
I don’t understand why the majority of clubs would go near this. Am I missing something? There are teams with tiny tiny stadiums who won’t sell a single kit or merch outside of a 5 miles radius of their ground in the PL. Doesn’t just tell them they can’t possibly ever ever win the league (which should be open to all via perfect recruitment and excellent management), it surely almost definitely condemns them to be at the very best a yo yo club, unless their recruitment is 100% perfect every time, and their highest paid players never ever do an ACL.It’s tedious. Which of these systems that favours the sky six and shafts everyone else would you rather have? By the way here’s some more points deductions and there’s zero way out for you ever unless you sell all your players or sell your new stadium.
![]()
Premier League: Profit and Sustainability Rules to remain next season ahead of vote change
The Premier League's current Profit and Sustainability Rules will remain in place next season.www.bbc.co.uk
This works very well for us, our wages are only 92% of our revenue.