Having read the first verdict I think we have a few avenues to pursue to get points back:
1: in the first case, the appeal board criticised the first IC for making up their own rules without sufficient regard for existing precedent (primarily from EFL cases). In terms of double jeopardy this is exactly what they’ve done again: they made up their own rule rather than adopt the EFL precedent. Under the EFL precedent our previous losses would be capped and we wouldn’t even have breached. This is a route to zero points.
2: the amount of mitigation accepted should have lead to a greater reduction in sentence - they accepted that we had plead guilty early, and accepted Ukraine war mitigation but only gave one point COMBINED for these. We could argue for a point each for an extra one back.
3. Proportionality to Forest: our IC basically accept that our case is disproportionate to the points given for scale of breach to Forest. However our IC said that’s because their IC was wrong. We’ll have things to say about that in the light of their appeal.