Keep your 8 points. Rats the lot of them....
wait till we’re safe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep your 8 points. Rats the lot of them....
Deffo sells ket that guy
Sky are reporting on this new proposal that premier league clubs can only spend 85% of their annual income on players wages, agent fees and transfers fees.
For us in the 2023 accounts it said our income was £181m so that means we could spend £144.8m on players wages, agent fees and transfers
We are currently spending around £80m on player wages
Do would have around £65m for transfer fees
It sounds better and more straightforward than the current system. Obviously it still favours the biggest teams with the highest revenue
Sky are reporting on this new proposal that premier league clubs can only spend 85% of their annual income on players wages, agent fees and transfers fees.
For us in the 2023 accounts it said our income was £181m so that means we could spend £144.8m on players wages, agent fees and transfers
We are currently spending around £80m on player wages
Do would have around £65m for transfer fees
It sounds better and more straightforward than the current system. Obviously it still favours the biggest teams with the highest revenue
Sky are reporting on this new proposal that premier league clubs can only spend 85% of their annual income on players wages, agent fees and transfers fees.
For us in the 2023 accounts it said our income was £181m so that means we could spend £144.8m on players wages, agent fees and transfers
We are currently spending around £80m on player wages
Do would have around £65m for transfer fees
It sounds better and more straightforward than the current system. Obviously it still favours the biggest teams with the highest revenue
Capology (whoever they are) seem to think it is.Our wage bill is not 80m.
Capology (whoever they are) seem to think it is.
To be honest, I'd take that figure with a pinch of salt as well. Accounting trickery to minimise the amount of tax they have to pay.
Evertons accounts seem to think its 159m.
Im gonna go with that number.
Agree, its not a great source.To be honest, I'd take that figure with a pinch of salt as well. Accounting trickery to minimise the amount of tax they have to pay.
Thats 22-23. 80m is for 23-24
Evertons accounts seem to think its 159m.
Im gonna go with that number.
Capital expenditures cannot be deducted from income for tax purposes, but operating expenses are eligible.Agree, its not a great source.
We havent halved our wage bill in 12months mate.Thats 22-23. 80m is for 23-24
PSR is quite easy to screw overCapital expenditures cannot be deducted from income for tax purposes, but operating expenses are eligible.
I'd imagine all our manager/director payoffs remain under opex for a tax write-off. Not suggesting we are lying about the number in the report. Just lying/being creative in the accounts we submit to HMRC.