msb
Player Valuation: £10m
I still hold a grudge with Clive Thomas.since 1977, so I understand the position.This, for beating them in the FA Cup semi-final? 39 years is a long time to hold a grudge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still hold a grudge with Clive Thomas.since 1977, so I understand the position.This, for beating them in the FA Cup semi-final? 39 years is a long time to hold a grudge.
Lived there for 6 years, as S/holes go, this place sets the barI stayed there for two days a couple of years ago and couldn't wait to get out of the place!
Thought that was just meI bet he’s one of those that had newspaper clippings of our misfortunes for the last thirty years all over his bedroom walls
They haven't had the chance to avenge it.This, for beating them in the FA Cup semi-final? 39 years is a long time to hold a grudge.
It was probably due to the cost associated with defending it and the potential points increase that could've been handed out.So basically - We had a good week on the pitch and therefore decided that the deduction was fair
The latest in a long line of baffling decisions by Everton Football Club
I hope and pray you are right.I see more bedwetters are still going on about administration! Don't believe what some are saying. It won't happen.
True and I'd imagine that Forest getting nothing back indicated that we wouldn't either.It was probably due to the cost associated with defending it and the potential points increase that could've been handed out.
It also demonstrates that we haven't run up unnecessary time and energy with the appeal process which should be a persuasive factor at our next hearing.
It's a sensible decision.
Agreed, but as often as I have also tried to explain this it doesn’t seem to be sinking in with someWhy do you think points could have been added? The prem didn’t appeal the decision because they were happy with the outcome and the amount of points deducted. Meaning the appeals board wouldn’t have to listen to counter arguments from the prem’s lawyers to look for reasons to increase the points during the hearing.
We appealed for being too high so the IC only had 1 remit, hearing our argument and potentially reducing the amount. If they didn’t agree with those arguments then the penalty would stay the same.
It couldn’t have handed out a points increaseIt was probably due to the cost associated with defending it and the potential points increase that could've been handed out.
It also demonstrates that we haven't run up unnecessary time and energy with the appeal process which should be a persuasive factor at our next hearing.
It's a sensible decision.
When finances outweigh morals - the end is nighIt was probably due to the cost associated with defending it and the potential points increase that could've been handed out.
It also demonstrates that we haven't run up unnecessary time and energy with the appeal process which should be a persuasive factor at our next hearing.
It's a sensible decision.
I've literally said that in my first paragraphIt couldn’t have handed out a points increase