I think, in this case, the opposite is far more likely.When finances outweigh morals - the end is nigh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think, in this case, the opposite is far more likely.When finances outweigh morals - the end is nigh
You have literally stated in your first paragraph…..and the ‘potential points increase that could have been handed out’I've literally said that in my first paragraph
Correct. They could increase the points deduction.You have literally stated in your first paragraph…..and the ‘potential points increase that could have been handed out’
But there was no potential for a points increase? There was only two out ones from our appeal….1) the points deduction was reduced or 2) the points deduction stayed the same…..there was no possibility/potential of it being increasedCorrect.
That's not accurate. The appeal could increase the deduction. The wording of the appeal board powers is that it may 'vary the penalty or order imposed by the initial hearing'. It's unlikely but it's not impossible and mounting appeals with little chance of success might be considered vexatious.But there was no potential for a points increase? There was only two out ones from our appeal….1) the points deduction was reduced or 2) the points deduction stayed the same…..there was no possibility/potential of it being increased
But surely the power to that is only based on the nature of the appeal? If the PL did not appeal it the power they have is limited to the nature of the appeal? I work in civil litigation and a change in sanction or award can only be varied based on the scope of the appeal? Anyway, it’s done regardless.That's not accurate. The appeal could increase the deduction. The wording of the appeal board powers is that it may 'vary the penalty or order imposed by the initial hearing'. It's unlikely but it's not impossible and mounting appeals with little chance of success might be considered vexatious.
RubbishCorrect. They could increase the points deduction.
Why risk it?But surely the power to that is only based on the nature of the appeal? If the PL did not appeal it the power they have is limited to the nature of the appeal? I work in civil litigation and a change in sanction or award can only be varied based on the scope of the appeal? Anyway, it’s done regardless.
FactsRubbish
It won’t oh really? Why so confident it won’t? It’s a real possibility, if we do sell players that won’t even cover the loans we’ve had off others, thread bare squad already plus any outgoing sales. Last few years have been grim and the future looks just as bad. I hope you’re right and it doesn’t happen.I see more bedwetters are still going on about administration! Don't believe what some are saying. It won't happen.
Don't need to work in civil litigation to know this kind of thing; I'm a floor fitter and I'd say it's still all to play for.But surely the power to that is only based on the nature of the appeal? If the PL did not appeal it the power they have is limited to the nature of the appeal? I work in civil litigation and a change in sanction or award can only be varied based on the scope of the appeal? Anyway, it’s done regardless.
What’s all to play for sorry?Don't need to work in civil litigation to know this kind of thing; I'm a floor fitter and I'd say it's still all to play for.