Iana
Player Valuation: £2.5m
I read it as only if City win against all charges and their costs are awarded will every PL club be liable for an equal share of the approx £120m costs for both sides.X 2 parties = 120m
I read it as only if City win against all charges and their costs are awarded will every PL club be liable for an equal share of the approx £120m costs for both sides.X 2 parties = 120m
Yep that’s what will happen, I think the scenario MaGuire was painting was if City win.I read it as only if City win against all charges and their costs are awarded will every PL club be liable for an equal share of the approx £120m costs for both sides.
Is this correct, he’s saying City’s defence is that the PL shouldn’t be using hacked emails as evidenceWell, that escalated.![]()
And also, if City were hackedIs this correct, he’s saying City’s defence is that the PL shouldn’t be using hacked emails as evidence
If that holds up then the PL have nothing
….but if the commission accepts the evidence then there can be no mitigation and we’re looking at 60-100 points deduction
true but that failure to engage with the investigation process is much more difficult to defend. I'm not sure saying 'we didnt engage with you as we knew you'd find stuff' probably isnt the best defence to that oneIs this correct, he’s saying City’s defence is that the PL shouldn’t be using hacked emails as evidence
If that holds up then the PL have nothing
….but if the commission accepts the evidence then there can be no mitigation and we’re looking at 60-100 points deduction
indeed, they commit quite a serious criminal offence and get a paltry fine. We build a stadium and get whacked with points that could have had an existential impact upon us.And also, if City were hacked
Then we know who the main suspects are
![]()
Liverpool paid Manchester City £1m settlement over scouting complaint
Liverpool paid a £1m settlement to Manchester City after the Etihad club complained that their scouting system had been hacked, Sky Sports News understands.www.skysports.com
About as effective as Moshiri's defence "we needed a midfielder so we bought one".true but that failure to engage with the investigation process is much more difficult to defend. I'm not sure saying 'we didnt engage with you as we knew you'd find stuff' probably isnt the best defence to that one
Can they add on anything for any previous offence, given that offence has not been through the system, and therefore not proven/unproven?
Is this correct, he’s saying City’s defence is that the PL shouldn’t be using hacked emails as evidence
If that holds up then the PL have nothing
….but if the commission accepts the evidence then there can be no mitigation and we’re looking at 60-100 points deduction
-12 points for Everton for having the audacity to want to improve future revenue to compete with cheating teams by building a new stadium.Dont quite agree with the 3 charges stuff. City have literally got away with PSR 7sep times,for one.
• 54x Failure to provide accurate financial information 2009-10 to 2017-18.
• 14x Failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments from 2009-10 to 2017-18.
• 5x Failure to comply with Uefa's rules including Financial Fair Play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18.
• 7x Breaching Premier League's PSR rules 2015-16 to 2017-18.
• 35x Failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations December 2018 - Feb 2023.
Dont quite agree with the 3 charges stuff. City have literally got away with PSR 7sep times,for one.
• 54x Failure to provide accurate financial information 2009-10 to 2017-18.
• 14x Failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments from 2009-10 to 2017-18.
• 5x Failure to comply with Uefa's rules including Financial Fair Play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18.
• 7x Breaching Premier League's PSR rules 2015-16 to 2017-18.
• 35x Failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations December 2018 - Feb 2023.