DanEFC92
Player Valuation: £90m
who is going to be on the appeals panel?
surely they actually have to be independent this time?
that last panel was the opposite of independent.
John Aldridge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who is going to be on the appeals panel?
surely they actually have to be independent this time?
that last panel was the opposite of independent.
Zippy. George and Bungle with Rod Jane and Freddy in reserve.who is going to be on the appeals panel?
surely they actually have to be independent this time?
that last panel was the opposite of independent.
Not quiet how I read it tbh. I read it as we never set out with the intention of gaining a sporting advantage, but due to the fact that any PSR infraction is to be considered gaining a sporting infraction, then it has to be said that we did. That, and the fact they think Moshiri is too rich, was the leading factor in the 10 point deduction.
The only thing they have been clear on is that we didn't set off to intentionally break PSR, and that with the insistence of a sporting sanction, that we did.
Now, if this is the punishment for not intending to break PSR, but doing so by accident, then heaven forbid what happens to clubs who are though to have intentionally done so. 20 points per infraction? Either that or absolutely nothing.
Maybe we can do the claim merry-go-round. Leeds etc sue us over it and we then sue Chelsea and man City for it... be kinda funny. Imagine.What amuses me about the sporting advantage gain and compensation claims. we spent money to try and kick on. Failed miserably at it but regardless. If we had finished mid table those clubs wouldnt be sniffing around Everton for compo. So if found guilty will they be seeking compo from city and chelsea. As Everton will be being sued for sporting gain. Those clubs gained to. They just did it better than us.
I bet they dont go near anywhere near them.
The target for everyone is clearly Everton.
That's such an abstract idea I can't really see how it can be proved either way.There is a presumption of sport advantage I think.
Maybe we can do the claim merry-go-round. Leeds etc sue us over it and we then sue Chelsea and man City for it... be kinda funny. Imagine.
You for a sporting advantage so we are suing you. Well they both got one too so we are suing them for that. Be like a circus lol claims all over the place.
You're quoting the EFL rules. The report says it was wrong for Everton to refer to the rules of a different league so quoting them is pointless.No i am trying to say that you are just misunderstanding what is written. Every case is considered a 12 point sporting breach at the start as per the criteria and formula you are quoting from. In Everton's specific case, they found no evidence of a deliberate breach to gain a sporting advantage (which is really important for the future) but then used their stated criteria as the punishment which is always going to be you get hung drawn and quartered no matter what.
The report refers to the EFLs treatment of Sheffield Wednesday and they have used that as the basis for sporting advantage being inferred but can’t be quantified.That's such an abstract idea I can't really see how it can be proved either way.
kevin campbell, duncan ferguson and pat nevinwho is going to be on the appeals panel?
surely they actually have to be independent this time?
that last panel was the opposite of independent.
No i am trying to say that you are just misunderstanding what is written. Every case is considered a 12 point sporting breach at the start as per the criteria and formula you are quoting from. In Everton's specific case, they found no evidence of a deliberate breach to gain a sporting advantage (which is really important for the future) but then used their stated criteria as the punishment which is always going to be you get hung drawn and quartered no matter what.
The commission said that the reason we are getting a points deduction is because the owner is too wealthy for a fine to be the punishment.
John Aldridge
Thanks palThey claim everything will before before season ends, some have said 12 weeks for appeal and count-appeal. But i will believe it when i see it.
Has to be dealt with this season though, it can't carry over.
Maybe we can do the claim merry-go-round. Leeds etc sue us over it and we then sue Chelsea and man City for it... be kinda funny. Imagine.
You for a sporting advantage so we are suing you. Well they both got one too so we are suing them for that. Be like a circus lol claims all over the place.
The PL will then suddenly make it so those top clubs get an extra ,£,100m from the tv deal.. lolWhy don't we all just sue each other for £100m, everybody win and be done with it.