He's bought and paid for...that's what i got from watching that."We can't look at the past"
Can't we? My God, what a self-serving spiv.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's bought and paid for...that's what i got from watching that."We can't look at the past"
Can't we? My God, what a self-serving spiv.
AbsolutelyNo one will care what ornstein says, neville is pretty much 'the voice' of sky football so that will cut through big time
Saying stuff about signing Gueye and Doucoure, selling Digne, and the potential for that to be viewed as "reckless"
He was on the Athletic's podcast the other day and was totally on our side, just changed up a bit
I was going to say he was quite defensive on the Athletic podcast. Strange that he has changed tact and a bit of a worry with the comments from Joyce earlier in the week.
Wasn’t it to pay for the change from an athletics stadium to a football stadium after they were gifted it?Assuming this is referring to Man City, when did they take out a loan to build a stadium? Wasn't theirs given to them?
Reductionist nonsense and one the false narritives you are keen to push to prey on peoples anxieties
Like that Nick Harris on Lineker's podcast. That was dreadful, and very pro-PL.
Just started watching this. Well done to Gary Neville for bringing the conversation back to reality after 5 minutes of Everton bashing from that weasel Ornstein and Keane, telling us to “take our medicine”. Just felt like it was getting set up as a pro-PL arse covering and damage limitation exercise, I’m surprised Neville was allowed to say what he’s said and it’s been allowed to go out by the producers.
Wasn’t it to pay for the change from an athletics stadium to a football stadium after they were gifted it?
Wants to sue his barber.
2022 was the year we were forced to cut ties with Ussie, there is a good chance it has affected that years accounts, what is certain is that it affected our ability to increase revenue that year, a potential 200m stadium naming rights deal just one example.How is it false? The majority of the years in question we would have been paid by USM.
For the 21/22 season we might have been paid in full at the start of the season, no idea what terms we would have agreed.