Ring master
Player Valuation: £90m
Monday is called "Blue Monday" , Supposedly classed as the most depressing day of the year lol. Could be right for a few clubs then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did you cut and paste that post from. It's got a capital letter and even an exclamation mark. Come on, fess up.
No, you're correct, as far as it goes, they don't want to leave the league, but, EUFA won't allow any of its affiliated national leagues to allow teams that have joined the ESL to play in said national league. There is a lot more to come in the next season or two from this story.
The deductions will continue until sustainability improves.
Suspicious as to why Andy Burnham and Steve Rotherham are at the FAB meeting on Sunday pre Villa game.
Marius57
Player Valuation: £60m
Probably in regard to the appeal rather than more sanctions. Considering how vocal Burnham has been about the process, it’s hardly a surprise.
Gilbert..
Player Valuation: £50m
They might aswell. If that door is opened they will kick it off its hinges within a few years. Not just the premier league but a few domestic leagues in spain italy etc will be as good as left. They'll just treat the leagues like teams do the caraboa cup and use it to play reserve sides.
Newcastle will be sailing close soon.
Newcastle United post £73m loss for 2022-23 season
Newcastle United could still sell players to their rivals, chief executive Darren Eales warns, after they post a £73m loss.
www.bbc.co.uk
Not so sure.
Cake
Player Valuation: £1m
Man City have reported revenue of £710m, about half that will be spent on wages and they don't exactly spend PL-style massive amounts on transfers and when they sell they seem to sell for a more than decent price.
What are their 115 charges, then? They can't be breaching profit and sustainability. Where is the other £350m or so of revenue going? These figures are from this year's accounts (from a BBC article on Newcastle bleating about their income and losses of £73m (+ non-repayed interest free loans to Staveley). Although City's charges are from the past their income/expenditure/profit ratios must be about the same from the time the charges relate to. Here's a link to the article;
So, are their charges Blatter 'brown envelope' type charges from transfer dealings (to agents) and to do with their franchise clubs in different leagues around the world?
What are their 115 charges, then? They can't be breaching profit and sustainability. Where is the other £350m or so of revenue going? These figures are from this year's accounts (from a BBC article on Newcastle bleating about their income and losses of £73m (+ non-repayed interest free loans to Staveley). Although City's charges are from the past their income/expenditure/profit ratios must be about the same from the time the charges relate to. Here's a link to the article;
Newcastle United post £73m loss for 2022-23 season
Newcastle United could still sell players to their rivals, chief executive Darren Eales warns, after they post a £73m loss.
www.bbc.co.uk
So, are their charges Blatter 'brown envelope' type charges from transfer dealings (to agents) and to do with their franchise clubs in different leagues around the world?
Bruno goes this summer. 1) They won't UCL and he's had a nice taste of it and 2) He signed a contract with a release clause for a reason.Newcastle will be sailing close soon.
Newcastle United post £73m loss for 2022-23 season
Newcastle United could still sell players to their rivals, chief executive Darren Eales warns, after they post a £73m loss.www.bbc.co.uk
EFC_FRANCIS
Player Valuation: £35m
You have to say the league painting themselves into a corner and setting an arbitrary figure that doesn't adjust for inflation does not seem to have been the smartest of ideas. Half the league will have received a points deduction by the end of the decade
In accordance with Premier League Rule W.82.1, the Premier League confirms that it has today referred a number of alleged breaches of the Premier League Rules by Manchester City Football Club (Club) to a Commission under Premier League Rule W.3.4.Man City have reported revenue of £710m, about half that will be spent on wages and they don't exactly spend PL-style massive amounts on transfers and when they sell they seem to sell for a more than decent price.
What are their 115 charges, then? They can't be breaching profit and sustainability. Where is the other £350m or so of revenue going? These figures are from this year's accounts (from a BBC article on Newcastle bleating about their income and losses of £73m (+ non-repayed interest free loans to Staveley) and their charges are from the past but their income/expenditure/profit ratios must be about the same from the time the charges relate to. Here's a link to the article;
Newcastle United post £73m loss for 2022-23 season
Newcastle United could still sell players to their rivals, chief executive Darren Eales warns, after they post a £73m loss.www.bbc.co.uk
So, are their charges Blatter 'brown envelope' type charges from transfer dealings (to agents) and to do with their franchise clubs in different leagues around the world?
Details of the Premier League Rules that the Club is alleged to have breached are as follows:
1. In respect of each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those seasons that required provision by a member club to the Premier League, in the utmost good faith, of accurate financial information that gives a true and fair view of the club’s financial position, in particular with respect to its revenue (including sponsorship revenue), its related parties and its operating costs, namely:
(a) for Season 2009/10, Premier League Rules B.13, C.71, C.72 and C.75 (from 10 September 2009, Premier League Rules B.13, C.71, C.72, C.79 and C.80);
(b) for Season 2010/11, Premier League Rules B.13, C.78, C.79, C.86 and C.87;
(c) for Season 2011/12, Premier League Rules B.13, C.78, C.79, C.86 and C.87;
(d) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules B.16, E.3, E.4, E.11 and E.12;
(e) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rules B.15, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.49;
(f) for Season 2014/15, Premier League Rules B.16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.50;
(g) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules B.16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.50;
(h) for Season 2016/17, Premier League Rules B.16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.51; and
(i) for Season 2017/18, Premier League Rules B.16, E.3, E.4, E.11, E.12 and E.51.
2. In respect of:
(a) each of Seasons 2009/10 to 2012/13 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2009/10 to 2011/12 inclusive, Premier League Rules Q.7 and Q.8; and
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules P.7 and P.8; and
(b) each of Seasons 2010/11 to 2015/16 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to include full details of player remuneration in its relevant contracts with its players, namely:
(1) for Seasons 2010/11 and 2011/12, Premier League Rules K.12 and K.20;
(2) for Season 2012/13, Premier League Rules T.12 and T.20;
(3) for Seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15, Premier League Rules T.12 and T.19; and
(4) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules T.13 and T.20.
3. In respect of each of Seasons 2013/14 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons requiring a member club to comply with UEFA’s regulations, including UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations, namely:
(a) for Season 2013/14, Premier League Rule B.14.6; and
(b) for Seasons 2014/15 to 2017/18 inclusive, Premier League Rule B.15.6.
4. In respect of each of the Seasons 2015/16 to 2017/18 inclusive, the Premier League Rules applicable in those Seasons on Profitability and Sustainability, namely:
(a) for Season 2015/16, Premier League Rules E.52 to E.60; and
(b) for Seasons 2016/17 and 2017/18, Premier League Rules E.53 to E.60.
5. In respect of the period from December 2018 to date, the Premier League Rules applicable in the relevant Seasons requiring a member club to cooperate with, and assist, the Premier League in its investigations, including by providing documents and information to the Premier League in the utmost good faith, namely:
(a) for Season 2018/19, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(b) for Season 2019/20, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(c) for Season 2020/21, Premier League Rules B.16, B.19, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13;
(d) for Season 2021/22, Premier League Rules B.15, B.18, W.1, W.2, W.12 and W.13; and
(e) for Season 2022/23, Premier League Rules B.15, B.18, W.1, W.2, W.15 and W.16.
Commissions are independent of the Premier League and member clubs. The members of the Commission will be appointed by the independent Chair of the Premier League Judicial Panel, in accordance with Premier League Rules W.19, W.20 and W.26.
The proceedings before the Commission will, in accordance with Premier League Rule W.82, be confidential and heard in private. Under Premier League Rule W.82.2, the Commission’s final award will be published on the Premier League’s website.
This confirmation is made in accordance with Premier League Rule W.82.1. The Premier League will be making no further comment in respect of this matter until further notice.
And some people wonder why this is taking longer than ours.
Cake
Player Valuation: £1m
... makes us look like we were *selling illegal vapes from a corner shop.Edit: *Not that this shouldn't be a punishable offence...
chrismpw
Player Valuation: £70m
Got to wonder why van organisation responsible for the game, worth millions, didn't act when theyvdud wrong in 2008 snd pinch it in the bud.
Ahhh .... just like the post office. Inept amateur, jobs for the boys Britain innit.