Phillip Buckingham in the Athletic with straight up incorrect claims/lies.
Quoting the commission in the Forest case, he says the 'bad information' we provided was the reason our penalty was 'bumped up' to 6 points. That's not true. It was the reason it was bumped up to 10 and then reduced to the 'minimum' of 6 by the appeal, because it wasn't within their remit to punish for it.
If football's governance is going to be held to account, then these half arsed journos need to get their act together and start asking the right questions instead of parroting the source.
Does this read like a process with people who are informed or have any idea what they are doing? It's complete guesswork "we don't know how, but it must relate to..."
This is insane to me. The entire thing is a complete mess.