On the one hand Given its a big hitter from the Athletic rather than Boyland it's automatically more credible.
On the other the athletic were a leader in printing and spreading Prennos lies about headlock gate.
I personally have no doubt we are up the swanny and need 20 million to stay afloat. Moshiri has been effectively shadow sanctioned by the government and has no liquid assets and we have no funding for the ongoing construction that swallowed about 80 million in transfers this summer.
Forget the publication for a moment...
I don't doubt Ornstein, he broke this and it'll be true;
- Everton have received a sizeable loan from prospective new owners 777 Partners.
- Premier League rules prevent the company from investing directly into Everton via an equity injection, unless and until the deal it has in place with Moshiri is granted a green light.
- Given Everton’s pressing need for immediate funding, 777 has lent them money on an interim basis to help with short-term working capital requirements and the stadium build.
.... But why all of a sudden the narrative/commentary around administration/needing that loan just to stay operating? We've forever been taking loans - why would a loan by a potential future owner by any different to previous loans?