777 Partners / Whatever the hell you like

[ToffeeTim]

Josh is getting tetchy.

He's got a point about them providing funding to the club

 

[pfim]

Hard to argue with wander's comment that they've kept us afloat this last few months. We'd be in administration if they hadn't.

There's zero evidence of that. And he can shove his gratitude.

It also doesn't matter, if he can't close the deal.

 

[trueblue84]

There's zero evidence of that. And he can shove his gratitude.

The evidence is they've loaned us £180m.

 

[USABlue]

Hard to argue with wander's comment that they've kept us afloat this last few months. We'd be in administration if they hadn't.

I'm sure the club could've gotten loans elsewhere, 777 aren't doing it out of charity as others have said I'm sure they've given the club an high interest rate on the loan

 

[pfim]

The evidence is they've loaned us £180m.

You said we would be in administration without 777. There's no evidence of that.

 

[Frenk]

If 777 could pass the PL suitability test, they would have already. That's the only detail germane to the conversation and the club.

Who is pushing what agenda through which outlet is irrelevant.

If he were disputing that Liege players were not paid on time, that Vasco did not have a transfer ban levied, that 777re was losing $2billion worth of capital, that would be relevant. I don't see that he has, because he can't.

I was saying that and then somebody pointed out that Ratcliffe's purchase of Man U shares took quite a while and it started back in the summer?

 

[BullensRoad]

If you get a chance follow @Citizens of Suburbia on X. Knows his stuff and is constantly putting someone in check.



Stark reminder, because someone speaks well and types in a posh font, doesn’t mean they know what they’re on about.

 

[Victus]

This is the stuff that goes over my head the most, it's frustrating to not be able to understand and make up my own true opinion, rather we rely on twitter accounts telling us what to think.

 

[Goat]

If you get a chance follow @Citizens of Suburbia on X. Knows his stuff and is constantly putting someone in check.



Stark reminder, because someone speaks well and types in a posh font, doesn’t mean they know what they’re on about.

*posh font.

lollollollol

 

[Goat]

This is the stuff that goes over my head the most, it's frustrating to not be able to understand and make up my own true opinion, rather we rely on twitter accounts telling us what to think.

Duh, just go to University and learn microeconomics, come back in 10 years and you will know it all.

 

[pfim]

I was saying that and then somebody pointed out that Ratcliffe's purchase of Man U shares took quite a while and it started back in the summer?

The deal was not agreed until December I believe. Then approved in February.

777 agreed in September I believe.

 

[nsno-chris]

Gutted about the posh font shout

What’s wrong with Times New Roman size 12

 

[BullensRoad]

Gutted about the posh font shout

What’s wrong with Times New Roman size 12

TBF you’re right, just his regal approach to everything to come across as factual and informative.

I’d like to formally retract the posh font shout.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

He's got a point about them providing funding to the club

Undoubtedly. And they’ve put their heads above the parapet for public scrutiny. Anything else about rival bidders is just “trust me, bro” at this point.

 

[windymiller]

Oh and "if they were a true fan of the club"

... are them journos/the people behind that publication Evertonians?

Is he referring to the Esk, maybe?