Double-meaning, which i suppose no one caught, as he was a 'fellow liberal' when he did the accused deeds. During which none of this was really seen as an issue.A bit liberal with his Willy.
I canāt get over that.
Double-meaning, which i suppose no one caught, as he was a 'fellow liberal' when he did the accused deeds. During which none of this was really seen as an issue.
Now that he's a perceived conservative, married and packed up his probing pecker...now he's fair game for the media-coordinated sex-scandal trope.
Ordinarily, who gives a flying frak about Russell Brand? Why is his alleged sexual deviancy from decades back massive news? Why are y'all so intensely interested?
Double-meaning, which i suppose no one caught, as he was a 'fellow liberal' when he did the accused deeds. During which none of this was really seen as an issue.
Now that he's a perceived conservative, married and packed up his probing pecker...now he's fair game for the media-coordinated sex-scandal trope.
Ordinarily, who gives a flying frak about Russell Brand? Why is his alleged sexual deviancy from decades back massive news? Why are y'all so intensely interested?
Please for the love of God let this be true you unflushable turd.I don't think I've got anything left to say here
It is the only way.Ignore.
Double-meaning, which i suppose no one caught, as he was a 'fellow liberal' when he did the accused deeds. During which none of this was really seen as an issue.
Now that he's a perceived conservative, married and packed up his probing pecker...now he's fair game for the media-coordinated sex-scandal trope.
Makes this thread seem less an attack on Russell's alleged sex crimes, it feels more like a gleeful Culture War pile-on (see also Kavanaugh from a few years back). The instant presumption of guilt of the political-other is something to behold. Is everyone ignoring innocent-until-proven-guilty? Or Brand's own remarks that all these activities were consensual?
Ordinarily, who gives a flying frak about Russell Brand? Why is his alleged sexual deviancy from decades back massive news? Why are y'all so intensely interested?
Is it the humanity? Or something else?
I don't think I've got anything left to say here, except to allow the accused 3 minutes airtime in this discussion:
(after 4 hours since uploading over 33-thousand comments posted, the vast majority seem supportive of Brand...make of that what you will):
I'd been wanting to make the comparison myself, but he's just not worth engaging with LL. He would have defended Saville too, it makes you sick.Jimmy Saville - why is his alleged sexual deviancy from decades back massive news?
Agree and I should have reread my ~6pm post before posting!I'd been wanting to make the comparison myself, but he's just not worth engaging with LL. He would have defended Saville too, it makes you sick.
Correct. Same with YouTubeās demonetising, they havenāt stopped him posting, just stopped him earning from his posts.
And letās face it, thatās not a moral decision by YouTube, simply a financial one, as theyāre no doubt protecting the companies who currently donāt want their product associated with him.
Funny how some people want to ignore the actual story to push their own angle.
Canceling rapists, it's PC gone mad!!1!![]()
Burger King latest firm to pull ads from Rumble site for hosting Russell Brand's videos
One company said: 'It goes without saying that we would not be happy to be featured on Russell Brandās videos'inews.co.uk