This hasn't changed my mind.We didnt replace Richarlison with McNeil.
We replaced him with 7 new signings.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This hasn't changed my mind.We didnt replace Richarlison with McNeil.
We replaced him with 7 new signings.
50 pence….can’t sell him now but his stock is high, I wonder how much we’d get for him.
50 pence
? that would be a contract I couldn’t get behind!Yeah haha .... actually no haha
£28m plus add ons, which if they’re performance linked I’d be amazed if we had to pay a penny more. Nearest one I could see we might hit is if we owe them more if he signs a new contract, but that won’t be worth £6m extra.Retaining a player we paid 34m for will be a business decision and not something Frank Lampard will have much say on.
If we paid 28 by are standards of the last 5 or 6 years it was a real good deal.£28m plus add ons, which if they’re performance linked I’d be amazed if we had to pay a penny more. Nearest one I could see we might hit is if we owe them more if he signs a new contract, but that won’t be worth £6m extra.
Arsenal turned down 30m, we defo paid more than that.£28m plus add ons, which if they’re performance linked I’d be amazed if we had to pay a penny more. Nearest one I could see we might hit is if we owe them more if he signs a new contract, but that won’t be worth £6m extra.
Yeah but don't forget this deal with a very odd one, lots of money got moved around that day by Arsenal, Moshiri and several of his agent mates.Arsenal turned down 30m, we defo paid more than that.
If they have any sense, which im giving them, most add ons would have been appearance related.
I would still sell him to Forest in Jan.Yeah but don't forget this deal with a very odd one, lots of money got moved around that day by Arsenal, Moshiri and several of his agent mates.
Thing is whatever we paid he has done very well for us and fully deserves a glorious new contract.
By making him a high earner will encourage other players to work hard.
Relegation, rock bottom lad very soon.I've been a critic in the past but very pleased to be proven wrong to some degree this last few months.
Still, I would say he is playing like you would expect for his 70k a week now having not done before. Not playing beyond this to earn a pay rise to 100k if that's true.
Offer to renew at 75k. He won't get more than that elsewhere even as a free agent. Still a healthy wage for a good midtable player.
£100k per week x 4 years = £21m. He will have zero problem picking that up as a free agent. We paid £20m just to sign McNeil.
Even £40k pw wages turns that into a £30m+ outlay.
Relegation, rock bottom lad very soon.
Deluded, how does any of our lot think they deserve pay rises being bottom.
Bonkers!!
But we don't have a single player you can't say the exact same thing about.I would still sell him to Forest in Jan.
He did ok for like 4months, last few games hes gone back to being garbo.
Get him gone.