Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Not Safe For Work! Asking 200 Girls For Sex

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tubey said:
If you think of it in terms of not giving a rats arse what the response is, then it's not as mad as it looks! Nervousness only comes from having something depending on the outcome - unless the potential of receiving a fist to the face counts as that!
Click to expand...
Aye I spose. It'd just be awkward.
 
Tubey said:
Probably higher yeah.

Difference between men and women with sex is incentive - for a man, the incentive is in sex itself, for a woman, it's what she can get out of doing it, whether that's a rich man, stable relationship, straight cash or whatever.

A man will have sex solely due to mutual attraction. A woman won't. To give an example, if an A-List celeb hit on a single woman, they'd turn it down if they didn't recognise them, but probably accept if they did. If an A-List celeb hit on a single man, they'd probably accept regardless.
Click to expand...


That is the biggest load of bullshit ever. To the point where I'd have to question either your ability or your prolificacy as a sexual partner.

Women love sex, and it's incredibly sexist to suggest that they only do it for financial gain (be that through a rich man, a stable relationship or through the rather blunt straight cash option, because you know they're the big 3 aren't they? Women are prostitutes, is what you're saying?)

Women are less inclined to want sex for the sake of sex because it is 10x more likely for the man to get satisfaction. It's very easy to have a happy ending when you're a guy, but often women aren't satisfied because, to be fair, it's a more complicated process. In addition, it's often a societal thing -- the man courts the woman, the woman eventually says "oh, go on then, I'll let you", etc. When really that's archaic and there are plenty of women who will want sex for sex's sake, or want sex as a natural byproduct of attraction. Not to money, but to a person.
 
RadioFriendlyUnitShifter said:
That is the biggest load of bullshit ever. To the point where I'd have to question either your ability or your prolificacy as a sexual partner.

Women love sex, and it's incredibly sexist to suggest that they only do it for financial gain (be that through a rich man, a stable relationship or through the rather blunt straight cash option, because you know they're the big 3 aren't they? Women are prostitutes, is what you're saying?)

Women are less inclined to want sex for the sake of sex because it is 10x more likely for the man to get satisfaction. It's very easy to have a happy ending when you're a guy, but often women aren't satisfied because, to be fair, it's a more complicated process. In addition, it's often a societal thing -- the man courts the woman, the woman eventually says "oh, go on then, I'll let you", etc. When really that's archaic and there are plenty of women who will want sex for sex's sake, or want sex as a natural byproduct of attraction. Not to money, but to a person.
Click to expand...
So what your saying is women love sausage?
 
Tubey said:
Probably higher yeah.

Difference between men and women with sex is incentive - for a man, the incentive is in sex itself, for a woman, it's what she can get out of doing it, whether that's a rich man, stable relationship, straight cash or whatever.

A man will have sex solely due to mutual attraction. A woman won't. To give an example, if an A-List celeb hit on a single woman, they'd turn it down if they didn't recognise them, but probably accept if they did. If an A-List celeb hit on a single man, they'd probably accept regardless.
Click to expand...

So bascially all women are prostitutes the only difference is the form of payment??


..........there simply aren't words that won't get me banned.
 

RadioFriendlyUnitShifter said:
That is the biggest load of bullshit ever. To the point where I'd have to question either your ability or your prolificacy as a sexual partner.

Women love sex, and it's incredibly sexist to suggest that they only do it for financial gain (be that through a rich man, a stable relationship or through the rather blunt straight cash option, because you know they're the big 3 aren't they? Women are prostitutes, is what you're saying?)

Women are less inclined to want sex for the sake of sex because it is 10x more likely for the man to get satisfaction. It's very easy to have a happy ending when you're a guy, but often women aren't satisfied because, to be fair, it's a more complicated process. In addition, it's often a societal thing -- the man courts the woman, the woman eventually says "oh, go on then, I'll let you", etc. When really that's archaic and there are plenty of women who will want sex for sex's sake, or want sex as a natural byproduct of attraction. Not to money, but to a person.
Click to expand...

I didn't say women didn't like sex - of course they do, there's "you-know-what buddies", "swingers" etc. - but what I said they require an incentive to do it.

I had the same argument with a guy once - he said his partner and him have a fantastic sex life and there's nothing beyond that. I responded with "if you suddenly had to live in a cardboard box, would the fact you have good sex be enough to retain the relationship you have now?" The honest answer is no, of course not. It'd depend on the strength of the relationship as a whole, sex being a very much secondary factor in that scenario.

Taking your bold point, it's just not true. Watch the video above - do you really think their motive for saying no is because they're 10 times less likely to get off doing it? That is simply not the mindset - it's "why the hell would I? Are you mad? I know nothing about you whatsoever!" It doesn't matter what the person looks like, as that's by the by. The primary concern isn't that. The primary concern is knowing beforehand social status, whether you're a maniac, your personality, your likes and dislikes and so on.

And no, I'm not saying women are prostitutes. What I am saying is that women look for more in men than physical attraction. Yes, there are women that will in certain set scenarios, like after a night out drinking or swinging etc. but in the scenario dictated here, just a normal day in the street, it won't happen.
 
RAFUH said:
So bascially all women are prostitutes the only difference is the form of payment??


..........there simply aren't words that won't get me banned.
Click to expand...

Far too blunt. No, that's not what I am saying. What I AM saying is that a woman won't consider a sexual relationship with a man off the cuff based solely on physical appearance, as the video shows. They need more incentive than that. For a "normal" woman, that incentive is knowing the personality or the prospect of a long-term relationship. It's a deeper set of requirements than that of a man.
 

The video is not really a great social experiment, Tubey, nor does it highlight anything useful. Most women asked that won't answer yes or no to the question, but to the situation. If a woman propositions a man, the man is still in a position of power. Most women would feel quite unsafe if asked the same question by a random stranger, as to be honest, a lot of women live in fear of things like rape.

Women might want to know the person they're shagging for many reasons. Social status and wealth? FFS mate. How about safety -- people not having diseases. People not being murderous rapists. People being nice people. If a girl came up to me and asked for sex, I'd still want to know these things.

You really shouldn't generalise. Your tendency to say "women are this", "women want that" -- do you think you're Hitch or something? Jesus Christ. There are women who just want security or a trophy husband, sure. But there are men who don't want intellectual equals, just sex dolls with a pulse. There are also men who want equals; partners with whom they are great friends. These aren't gender-exclusive desires.

There is sex for sex's sake. There is sex in exchange for something. There is sex as part of a healthy partnership. Men and women partake in all three.
 
Tubey said:
Far too blunt. No, that's not what I am saying. What I AM saying is that a woman won't consider a sexual relationship with a man off the cuff based solely on physical appearance, as the video shows. They need more incentive than that. For a "normal" woman, that incentive is knowing the personality or the prospect of a long-term relationship. It's a deeper set of requirements than that of a man.
Click to expand...

Holy crap! I'm stunned. You've managed to discredit both genders.

From a women's perspective - you're full of s**t. Sex for the sake of sex works just fine as an incentive all on it's own, but then maybe I'm not normal..... and thank god for that!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Register
Back
Top