RFUS
Anustart
Whoah, you're telling me that women can orgasm before their name is on the deed to their partner's house? Without a cash transaction?!
You should publish this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not Safe For Work! Asking 200 Girls For Sex
- Thread starter Goat
- Start date
- Status
Whoah, you're telling me that women can orgasm before their name is on the deed to their partner's house? Without a cash transaction?!
You should publish this.
Oh I know, that's why I've just said they'd want to know if you're a maniac before doing it, for a start!
But it goes beyond that - all women are different, all motivations are different. £500 wouldn't be an incentive for one girl, but it might for the next - but it's the fact it is a form of incentive.
I think the video is useful in demonstrating one thing - for the obvious humour etc. in it, there's a less than 1% take up from women, 50% from men, and there's a reason for that.
To the bold bit - all sex is in exchange for something, by its' very definition it is. Whether that's as part of a relationship, or for money, or for sexual gratification, or for anything else, there isn't ever a situation where something is exchanged for it. But what I'm saying is that, for women, the "sexual gratification" reason due to sole physical attraction is well down the priority list when set against men.
For example, say a prostitute has a client lined up and he's massively attractive, and he says I want it for free. Would his attraction alone get him that? Or, say he pays the first time and he's amazing, would he get it for free in the future because of his performance?
Very unlikely. For a "normal" woman, it's even less likely. Would a woman stay with a man who battered her or cheated on her solely because he sexually pleases her?
When I generalise, I talk of the normal. I know there are women who enjoy sex for the sake of sexual gratification and if a man catches their eye, they'll want it for that reason. But they're not "normal" overall. Whereas for a man in the reverse situation, that is much closer to normal. Like you, I personally wouldn't, I value relationships, but it'd be naive of me to ignore my baser instincts and say it wouldn't be a temptation.
You haven't been to GOT until you get a big fume on over some bellend comment. Welcome to GOT.
Darling, I case you missed it.... I'm a ginger. Hardly my first fume, GOT or otherwise
You can tell yourself all day that you require more than the average woman before jumping into bed, and you can convince yourself that applies to all men, but you'll be lying to yourself if you did.
The prerequisite for sex for men is a lot lower than it is for women in general. That's not "discrediting a sex" - that's just common sense. Men are wired that way. You think everyone who browses porn is single?
RFUS
Anustart
I think your fundamental view of sex always being a transaction of some sort is incredibly saddening.
Admittedly the norm is probably not representative of what people actually feel or think, but maybe it highlights social conditioning or pressuring. Women are afraid to be labelled sluts, men are afraid to be labelled virgins. The former is something that annoys me -- if a guy tallies up his sexual conquests it's worthy of a cheer, but for a woman the number is indirectly proportional to her worth as a person. There's a deep rooted misogyny in there; a relic from a time were women were possessions, that really isn't relevant.
But I think you'll find, if you're in a relationship with a woman who has her own thoughts, feelings and opinions that sex will be a healthy part of the relationship not bound to exchange. Sure, even married couples of 20 odd years can swap sex for something, or use it as a reward, but that's the same as anything really. The fact is, sex is not fundamentally an exchange. It's a thing. We all want it, we mostly all do it, and we all have reasons for doing so, but to say that most women would use it to get something tangible before they'd do it for pleasure, paints a horrid picture both of your view of the world and of the female gender. So to reiterate -- I think you're speaking a metric ton of bullshit.
Admittedly the norm is probably not representative of what people actually feel or think, but maybe it highlights social conditioning or pressuring. Women are afraid to be labelled sluts, men are afraid to be labelled virgins. The former is something that annoys me -- if a guy tallies up his sexual conquests it's worthy of a cheer, but for a woman the number is indirectly proportional to her worth as a person. There's a deep rooted misogyny in there; a relic from a time were women were possessions, that really isn't relevant.
But I think you'll find, if you're in a relationship with a woman who has her own thoughts, feelings and opinions that sex will be a healthy part of the relationship not bound to exchange. Sure, even married couples of 20 odd years can swap sex for something, or use it as a reward, but that's the same as anything really. The fact is, sex is not fundamentally an exchange. It's a thing. We all want it, we mostly all do it, and we all have reasons for doing so, but to say that most women would use it to get something tangible before they'd do it for pleasure, paints a horrid picture both of your view of the world and of the female gender. So to reiterate -- I think you're speaking a metric ton of bullshit.
Is that it? No more takers?
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/28/sex-women-relationships-tanya-gold
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2007/08/01/top-20-reasons-women-said-they-have-sex/
Christ lads, there's a litany of stuff you could have thrown at me here. Up the game.
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/28/sex-women-relationships-tanya-gold
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2007/08/01/top-20-reasons-women-said-they-have-sex/
Christ lads, there's a litany of stuff you could have thrown at me here. Up the game.
Thanks for this.
My ability to produce rational, logical, non-cursing thought was lost when my head exploded.
If women seriously only had sex for material gain, think of the repercussions of that logically - you'd have a situation of peacocking, where vast crowds of men show off their bling as women watch from the stands, picking one out who is "worthy"
RFUS
Anustart
Oh great, the "LOL I WAS TROLLING YOU" card.
Let's hope you really were mate, and that you're not just backpedaling. For your sake, not for mine. I could have been having sex with my girlfriend instead of arguing with you ffs.
Hahaha!
She's on WoW so I was bored ^^ I asked her what the number one reason for having sex is, and it was "to have a whopping orgasm."
Settles it really!
It was about ten years ago when I ran a website that I was chatting to a moderator about this exact thing and he genuinely believed women aren't interested in sex unless you offer something in return. Just wasn't having it. He wouldn't even have the "emotional attachment" argument either - he had a black and white view that women basically use sex as a trading card and everything boils down to "what's in it for me".
As you said, it indicates that he's never had a relationship where it was mutually enjoyed, which is sad.
- Status