TheSecondComing
Player Valuation: £35m
If you don’t think he’s part of the issue of this football club for the past 20 years you need to have a word with yourself
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not sure anyone has said that. The whole club is rotten to the core, but neither is he solely responsible. Perspective comes with age, just because we had the worst of defeats yesterday, does not mean anyone who has tried their very best for the club (even if it has been poor at times) deserves unmitigated vilification from the fans. The term supporter is indicative of where we need to be, not simple hysteria and mob mentality.If you don’t think he’s part of the issue of this football club for the past 20 years you need to have a word with yourself
How about we compare our club to fellow Premier League everpresents: Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, Liverpool and Tottenham instead of clubs who’ve always had a history of yo-yoing between the leagues?Look at Blackburn, Wigan, Charlton, Leeds - all were in the PL and all falling away to nothing. Whilst Kenwright is no saint, our club still have not fallen like they have - and you can add perennial bounce clubs to that list too, such as Palace, Norwich ... the list seems endless.
No, Kenwright is not even a good chairman, but he is far, far from the worst. And until one puts ones house and livelihood on the line for the blues, I think one should really at least acknowledge a man that did.
We have been mediocre during his chairmanship and no-one is content with that, but having a millionaire owner in an era of biliionaire ownership was never going to achieve the heights we wanted. If he retains his role as a puppet chairman as a reward for keeping us alive, I won't begrudge him that title.
How about we compare our club to fellow Premier League everpresents: Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, Liverpool and Tottenham instead of clubs who’ve always had a history of yo-yoing between the leagues?
If you don’t think he’s part of the issue of this football club for the past 20 years you need to have a word with yourself
How about we compare our club to fellow Premier League everpresents: Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, Liverpool and Tottenham instead of clubs who’ve always had a history of yo-yoing between the leagues?
I don’t care about the rest of the PL, I care about Everton. He’s the worst chairman in Everton’s history and he should have been punted after the Kirkby debacle.I was pointing out that he was not the worst chairman ever in the PL, not that he's the best. Do keep up.
I don’t care about the rest of the PL, I care about Everton. He’s the worst chairman in Everton’s history and he should have been punted after the Kirkby debacle.
I don’t care about the rest of the PL, I care about Everton. He’s the worst chairman in Everton’s history and he should have been punted after the Kirkby debacle.
Ultimately none of us know if he actually went for Moyes or not but there's no smoke without fire and several "respected" journalists seemed to confirm itHe didn't people just decided he did so they can moan for the sake of it
The lack of spending money was never the issue. Though I would dispute that what we made from sales always went back into the club.He didn't have the option to have ambition! We were skint, what we did make on sales etc generally went back into the team or on increasing our existing players/staff wages so they would stay here. Its not a down playing of expectations its a managing of them. People like you (only use your turn of phrase here...) seem to think that we should have spent money we didn't have to show some "ambition" its utter fantasy stuff with zero basis in the real world.
As chairman he obviously hold some influence on such matter, its delusional to pretend that he has no influence at all. If he doesn't and is totally and utterly irrelevant and about as useful as a broken lightbulb then he's an even worse chiarman then I thought. As long as he continues to have any influence on this club at any level it will remain a terrible act of self harm.Players being here for years have got nothing to do with him! Moshiri has been in charge for a while now and the chairman or board does not pick and chose who stays and goes anyway.
He has overseen nothing but failure during his time here. He's not delivered anything even approaching success at any point.He is not the biggest failure in our history either. We have been relegated in the past (not sure if they had chairmen as such back then to be honest) and we have had relegation fights, we had none of them under him. No way is he worse than Johnson either. He was a fairly average chairman who had some bad moments and some solid ones.
The reality is that Kenwright is a failure full stop who never delivered anything approaching success to this football club and is a negative influence on it.I think you are confusing mediocrity and reality.
Our first team lost to Liverpool reserves yesterday, three years after Bill Kenwright relinquished control of the club and there are some who would still blame him.
We need to face up to our current problems , and Bill Kenwright is not one of those.
Peter Johnson tenure yielded 1 FA Cup.Factually incorrect. Peter Johnson was the worst Chairman in Everton's history. However, you can't ask me to compare it to your choice of clubs to suit your agenda, then when I point out my argument, say you don't care about other clubs. It is either one or the other.
FYI I really care about Everton too and i think Kenwright has been disastrous.
Peter Johnson tenure yielded 1 FA Cup.
What has Kenwright achieved?