Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mate, it's just over an hour - listen to the whole podcast and you should get the message.Is my summary that far from the mark though? If so, summarise what I missed about buying 4% of the club.
it is the kernel, but far from the full point
Again, with respect no. Listen to the whole thing and it will become abundantly clear.So humour me. What is the kicker that a 96% shareholder has to listen to 400,000 lads and lasses owning the other 4%?
No cheese toasting on Kenwright's burning carcass option?Have now added a poll - only open for 4 days
Again, with respect no. Listen to the whole thing and it will become abundantly clear.
Again and with the utmost respect, you need to listen to the entire discussion before making a judgment call.Moshiri and AU owned 30% of Arsenal, with zero influence. Unless Pauls followers, and others, raise a few billion to buy out Moshiri, unless I have missed sommet, (obvs have apparently), I just dont get it. And with respect, I am not going to spend an hour working that out.
Its a simple question mate. How do 4% shareholders develop meaningful change at the club? Other than not being Kenwright.
I am not dismissive of the idea, I suggested similar to fund the stadium back in the day, and I respect Paul, so there must be a silver bullet, I just cant see it.
Again and with the utmost respect, you need to listen to the entire discussion before making a judgment call.
We're painfully aware that while Moshiri holds 94%+ of the shares, he is to all intents and purposes in utter control... but, he's in utter control now and can't seem to oust BK.
The podcast offers a germ of an idea and a potential way to force things in the manner most Blues appear to want... removal of the Chairman.
Mate, I'm not going round and round with you.Despite the DM, going round in circles. A Chairman is appointed by an Owner. BK having no shares does not preclude Moshiri keeping him on. I thought Paul would have got that. Sure, it sends a message, but ultimately means zip.
Mate, I'm not going round and round with you.
I've asked/suggested anybody/everybody listen to the entire podcast BEFORE making a judgment - as we discuss all you're talking about, and take it further.
If you can't be bothered to listen to it all, that's fine.
I'm not here to force you to, merely suggesting strongly that you take just over an hour to listen to the entire discussion.
If you still prefer not to, like I say that's fine - just allow others to and to form their own opinion.
Im not sure the idea proposed was to influence the general direction of the club in any meaningful way…..I took the objective of the idea to be twofold….1) to remove Kenwright if this is what is needed to remove him, given that Moshiri appears to be incapable and this could be through the supporters trust. If a Kenwright wanted an inflationary price for his shares abI’ve market value, it would put to bed the ‘world‘s biggest blue’ bull sh1t and 2) to possibly get a trust seat on the Board….which would be more effective than the token fan advisory board currently in place which is mainly a regulatory requirement and a PR tool for the club. The general way it was communicated was that this would be way towards saving the ‘soul of the club’. That was my take anyway.Moshiri and AU owned 30% of Arsenal, with zero influence. Unless Pauls followers, and others, raise a few billion to buy out Moshiri, unless I have missed sommet, (obvs have apparently), I just dont get it. And with respect, I am not going to spend an hour working that out.
Its a simple question mate. How do 4% shareholders develop meaningful change at the club? Other than not being Kenwright.
I am not dismissive of the idea, I suggested similar to fund the stadium back in the day, and I respect Paul, so there must be a silver bullet, I just cant see it.
And we stress that point.If you could just basically outline why buying Kenwrights shares by the fans, stops an owner just keeping him, I am all ears.
I am not an apologist, I just dont get why an owner cant appoint anyone he wants.
@roydoIm not sure the idea proposed was to influence the general direction of the club in any meaningful way…..I took the objective of the idea to be twofold….1) to remove Kenwright if this is what is needed to remove him, given that Moshiri appears to be incapable and this could be through the supporters trust. If a Kenwright wanted an inflationary price for his shares abI’ve market value, it would put to bed the ‘world‘s biggest blue’ bull sh1t and 2) to possibly get a trust seat on the Board….which would be more effective than the token fan advisory board currently in place which is mainly a regulatory requirement and a PR tool for the club. The general way it was communicated was that this would be way towards saving the ‘soul of the club’. That was my take anyway.