Of course.Because we sit at a different financial table to United.
Of course.Because we sit at a different financial table to United.
When we paid 45m for Iceland, Bruno was moving to Porto for 8.5m.Wind the clock back a few years and in real terms Sigurdsson was close to that. We've wasted enough in the last two seasons to have bought a couple.
My two thoughts are one that no Godfrey is not good enough progressively because even if he's average at carrying he's well well below that passing forward. It's handicapping us with the ball.
And the other is that I don't think we're defending at a .5 goals per game level. I think we're defending at a 1 goal a game level which is very different in terms of what results you are getting. We were on a hot streak.
When we paid 45m for Iceland, Bruno was moving to Porto for 8.5m.
![]()
And our scouts in Europe? But my point was more that two seasons ago's 45m is today's 70m.If we want to play with the big boys it costs.When we paid 45m for Iceland, Bruno was moving to Porto for 8.5m.
![]()
Same with the likes of Maddison and his ilk, they don't do what they do now playing for Cursed FC.And if we would have signed him, he would have gone the same way as Vlasic unfortunately.
Other teams seem to manage the odd one. Man U picked up a decent one recently for around the price we pay for the mediocre.
No I don't agree because for example bringing Lucas Digne back is going to make us a little less good defensively and we all are for that right? So at best it is worth persevering with for now.Well with that back 4 we conceded 1 goal in 4 games. With variants on it, its 2 in 5/6 games. So say 0.7 is certainly attainable. Would you concede that such a defensive performance is worth persevering with?
On the first, I just gave you a key attacking aspect of the game Godfrey was good at. So he has some strengths.
I think we can get dogmatic in football in assuming what we like/prefer has to be right, even when evidence suggests the contrary. This feels like one of those moments.
And there is the conundrum,to attract the top players we need regular European competition to get that we need to buy better quality players. But wasting money on the Iwobi's Tosun's and Sigurdsson's isn't the way forward.Well United paid 65m for him, and he would never have come here mate.
James is on Fernandes level too, which just have to keep him fit.
I think playing 4 CB's works against the stronger sides who will have a go at us but doing so against the likes of Burnley and West Ham will often see us drop points as they'll often be happy sitting back for a point from the off meaning its on us to try break them down which is easier with attacking fullbacks who'll overlap the wide players.
Long term im fine with Holgate staying at RB as Coleman offers little going forward but Digne has to come back in for Godfrey once fit he offers too much going forward to leave out.
What you do with Digne is interesting. He has to play.
Until hes back, fitness aside I'd have that same back 4. If we continue to keep goals out, then Digne could play down the left with Richarlinson moving inside in a 4-4-2. If we start conceding a few more, Godfrey from Digne for me.
You should be looking to get the result in every game. If that means scraping, scrape away. Needs must.I've had people tell me we need to stick with the 4 CBs because of the security it brings so that viewpoint is out there.
My feeling is if you don't think you're good enough to make CL than you shouldn't be scraping out results. Instead this season should be used to develop the system you're going to use when you do think you're good enough.
And there is the conundrum,to attract the top players we need regular European competition to get that we need to buy better quality players. But wasting money on the Iwobi's Tosun's and Sigurdsson's isn't the way forward.