Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Carlos Quick Reply box

Poor aul Sassy gets a big long message out in the public by top brass. To be scolded for the appeasement of the hounds when a private message would have sufficed. A passionate caring new Evertonian who supports the blues well and a supporter of the forum.

Comments towards the integrity or fairness of the forums moderating will always be addressed publicly. More so when the nature is sensitive. There's issues to take the piss on, and this isn't one of them. Carry on, and I'll bin your account.

Same to you @YoboCopter. Playing Carlos like a puppet here will earn you very short shrift.

Thanks.
 
Comments towards the integrity or fairness of the forums moderating will always be addressed publicly. More so when the nature is sensitive. There's issues to take the piss on, and this isn't one of them. Carry on, and I'll bin your account.

Same to you @YoboCopter. Playing Carlos like a puppet here isn't will earn you very short shrift.

Thanks.
Fair enough GOT. Not having a go or getting involved in the subject at hand. Not disagreeing about your decision you are obviously at duty to make about the primary concern. I just thought it would be nicer to spare her the embarrassment but that’s how the ship is run then fair enough. I’ll leave it.
 

Fair enough GOT. Not having a go or getting involved in the subject at hand. Not disagreeing about your decision you are obviously at duty to make about the primary concern. I just thought it would be nicer to spare her the embarrassment but that’s how the ship is run then fair enough. I’ll leave it.

No need to backpedal.

Clearly, you were having a go and you have got involved.

You've criticised the moderating action, and you've also criticised the integrity and motive of my moderation;

"To be scolded for the appeasement of the hounds when a private message would have sufficed"

Each to their own - I'd suggest if you could tag me in any future criticism - especially when it's regarding the integrity of my moderating, I'll be able to ensure you get a reply.

As I said, when the matter is on the integrity/fairness of the moderating of the forum and when it's a sensitive topic - I ensure moderation is open and transparent.

I also do not moderate to any appeasement.

Thanks.
 
No need to backpedal.

Clearly, you were having a go and you have got involved.

You've criticised the moderating action, and you've also criticised the integrity and motive of my moderation;

"To be scolded for the appeasement of the hounds when a private message would have sufficed"

Each to their own - I'd suggest if you could tag me in any future criticism - especially when it's regarding the integrity of my moderating, I'll be able to ensure you get a reply.

As I said, when the matter is on the integrity/fairness of the moderating of the forum and when it's a sensitive topic - I ensure moderation is open and transparent.

I also do not moderate to any appeasement.

Thanks.
Well I didn’t take anything back. I just expanded on the fact I am not getting involved in the primary issue you had. Just how it was addressed. But, look I told you I want to grant your ultimatum and not carry on. As it’s your forum. I just really want to remain in it.

So above al else. Noted.
 
Well I didn’t take anything back. I just expanded on the fact I am not getting involved in the primary issue you had. Just how it was addressed. But, look I told you I want to grant your ultimatum and not carry on. As it’s your forum. I just really want to remain in it.

So above al else. Noted.

Maybe you could have spared me the embarrassment and sent me a private message...

No?

You also didn't "just" criticise the execution of the moderating (public vs private), you said I did so for the appeasement of others. Nonsense.
 


Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top