Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was using ‘hypothesis’ and ‘theory’ the way that scientists use them.

Maybe that's the issue. You ever thought of that? The 'theories' of science? The way to calculate and validate, based on decimal calculations only? It's the difference between 'knowing' that 1+1=2 or the 'concept' ( as used by philosophers and alchemists) that 1+1=3, the 3rd element being the new identity of the sum, possibly pushing thinking into a 3rd dimensional method.
Even quantum physics is starting to think along those lines.
 
I will say it think you have me pegged as a skeptic but in reality that's not me. I like to look at something and then research more into what i read or watched. I will always go to varied sources even if i don't necessarily agree with the person just to see what is said. Although i do draw a line at the Alex Jones types.

If you're interested the only thing I can suggest is to read the book and then you're in full possession of the facts to make you're own mind up. That video also goes on to describe the extent of the cover up and the methods used to carry it out, as in creating a bogus argument to steer your typical conspiracy theorist away down a blind alley. So what I'm suggesting is you have the official theory about Osama bin Laden and that's for people who are happy to believe what the TV tells them. You've then got the more inquisitive person that will see flaws in that argument and so an official conspiracy theory is created for them. That's the bombs in the building which you'll find discussed on things like Alex Jones etc. Dr Woods research is based on scientific fact and is smeared by people whose job is to discredit her. Only by looking at both arguments can you decide for yourself. If you only read what her enemies are saying you'll only come to one conclusion.

Alex Jones is a fraud btw. I would take anything he says on any subject with a pinch of salt. His very existence is to carachterure conspiracy theorists into wacky nuts like himself. He's doing a great job at it by the looks of things. It's come to the point we're any conspiracy theory is met with derision. As though it is not possible for two or more people to collude in secret to cause an event.
 
Maybe that's the issue. You ever thought of that? The 'theories' of science? The way to calculate and validate, based on decimal calculations only? It's the difference between 'knowing' that 1+1=2 or the 'concept' ( as used by philosophers and alchemists) that 1+1=3, the 3rd element being the new identity of the sum, possibly pushing thinking into a 3rd dimensional method.
Even quantum physics is starting to think along those lines.

LOL. 1+1=3, is on par with a giant directed energy weapon that "dustifies" the WTC complex (and associated cars a few blocks away, and some craters in the ground...). Which is to say pure bullsh!t.

But obviously you and Walter Ego are correct. 1+1 does in fact = 3, and there is a giant (location yet unknown) directed energy weapon that has taken down a few buildings in NYC. Also, Wal-Mart's stores are FEMA prisons, the Yeti exists, Hilary Clinton's campaign logo implies a 9-11 plot, Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer, there was a Pizza place in Washington DC that tortured children in its basement, Egyptians used acoustic levitation to move giant blocks of stone, and that you saw a UFO and won't even question an alternative interpretation of what you saw (...how is that for close-minded?).

My own views are obviously just on the fringes of some crazy irrational universe, you know, by arrogantly thinking that 2 + 2 = 4 and all that.
 
LOL. 1+1=3, is on par with a giant directed energy weapon that "dustifies" the WTC complex (and associated cars a few blocks away, and some craters in the ground...). Which is to say pure bullsh!t.

But obviously you and Walter Ego are correct. 1+1 does in fact = 3, and there is a giant (location yet unknown) directed energy weapon that has taken down a few buildings in NYC. Also, Wal-Mart's stores are FEMA prisons, the Yeti exists, Hilary Clinton's campaign logo implies a 9-11 plot, Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer, there was a Pizza place in Washington DC that tortured children in its basement, Egyptians used acoustic levitation to move giant blocks of stone, and that you saw a UFO and won't even question an alternative interpretation of what you saw (...how is that for close-minded?).

My own views are obviously just on the fringes of some crazy irrational universe, you know, by arrogantly thinking that 2 + 2 = 4 and all that.

You obviously have a narrow view that creates issues when confronted with alternative interpretations. You have completely missed the point, however you do seem to know more conspiracy theories than I do, which begs the question as to your fascination with them. Are you looking for answers or reassurance?

on the subject of what I saw, in a different post, in a different thread, given the information, offer up your explanation.

And to help you see things from a different view, I'll expand the equation, 1+1=2=3.
 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-got-anonymous-call-just-before-assassination

JFK files: British paper got anonymous call just before assassination

A reporter on the UK’s Cambridge Evening News received an anonymous call telling him to ring the US embassy for some big news, 25 minutes before the murder of John F Kennedy in Dallas, newly released documents say.

A memo written to the director of the FBI from the deputy director (Plans) of the CIA tells of the strange phone call made to the unnamed senior reporter on the paper.

Dated four days after the president’s death, it reveals how far the investigation into the events in Dallas reached.

The memo reads: “The British security service (MI-5) has reported that at 18:05 GMT on 22nd November and anonymous telephone call was made in Cambridge, England, to the senior reporter of the Cambridge News.

“The caller said only that the Cambridge News reporter should call the American embassy in London for some big news and then hung up.

“After the word of the president’s death was received the reporter informed the Cambridge police of the anonymous call and the police informed MI-5.

“The important point is that the call was made according to MI-5 calculations, about 25 minutes before the president was shot. The Cambridge reporter had never received a call of this kind before and MI-5 state that he is known to them as a sound and loyal person with no security record.”

The memo somewhat cryptically also states that “similar anonymous phone calls of a strangely coincidental nature have been received by persons in the UK over the past year” particularly in the case of a Dr Ward.

It ends: “The British Security Service stated its desire to assist in every way possible on any follow-up investigations required within the United Kingdom.”

The memo is signed by the deputy director James Angleton.

Kennedy was assassinated as his motorcade passed through Dallas on 22 November 1963. Lee Harvey Oswald, a former US marine, was charged with his murder. Oswald himself was shot dead two days later by nightclub owner Jack Ruby.
 
You obviously have a narrow view that creates issues when confronted with alternative interpretations. You have completely missed the point, however you do seem to know more conspiracy theories than I do, which begs the question as to your fascination with them. Are you looking for answers or reassurance?

on the subject of what I saw, in a different post, in a different thread, given the information, offer up your explanation.

And to help you see things from a different view, I'll expand the equation, 1+1=2=3.

You don't have a point; it's mostly just woo and word-salad that you're writing.

I don't have a fascination with conspiracy theories, just a passing interest, mostly because I don't like seemingly smart people suckered by stupidity.
 
You don't have a point; it's mostly just woo and word-salad that you're writing.

I don't have a fascination with conspiracy theories, just a passing interest, mostly because I don't like seemingly smart people suckered by stupidity.

You mean you choose not to see the point and lash out? You could have just said that, I would have understood. Namaste.
 
interesting how the majority of people think JFK murder was not oswald, mainly based on the oliver stone movie which just makes stuff up!
 

Maybe that's the issue. You ever thought of that? The 'theories' of science? The way to calculate and validate, based on decimal calculations only? It's the difference between 'knowing' that 1+1=2 or the 'concept' ( as used by philosophers and alchemists) that 1+1=3, the 3rd element being the new identity of the sum, possibly pushing thinking into a 3rd dimensional method.
Even quantum physics is starting to think along those lines.
I wasn’t lashing out. I was sincerely pointing out that you write nonsensically as shown above. “Pushing thinking into a 3rd dimensional method” and “the third element being the new identity of the sum”. That’s pure woo.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top